Wibowo, Renatha Amanda (2025) PENETAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP AHLI WARIS YANG BERBEDA AGAMA DENGAN PEWARIS MENURUT KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (Studi Putusan Nomor 0081/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bks). S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (6MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (532kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (352kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (455kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (187kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_REFF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (436kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
RENATHA AMANDA WIBOWO_1111210232_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This study discusses the determination of mandatory bequests for heirs of different religions from the testator based on the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) through Religious Court Decision Number 0081/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bks. This study is motivated by Islamic inheritance law provisions that prohibit inheritance for heirs of different religions, but still provide room for justice through the mechanism of mandatory wills. Therefore, this study formulates two main focuses, namely, the judge's considerations in determining mandatory wills for non-Muslim heirs, and the legal consequences of such determinations according to the KHI. The research method used is normative juridical with a case and legislation approach, as well as qualitative descriptive analysis based on secondary legal sources. The results of the study show that the judge's considerations were based on the principles of justice and benefit, with reference to the KHI and Supreme Court Jurisprudence Numbers 368K/AG/1998 and 51K/AG/1999, which confirm that children of different religions do not have heir status but are still entitled to receive a share through a mandatory will. Thus, non-Muslim heirs do not obtain inheritance rights according to fiqh, but still receive protection through the mechanism of mandatory wills as a form of substantive justice. The legal consequences of the mandatory will according to the KHI include the confirmation of the status of non-Muslim heirs as recipients of the mandatory will, the recognition of the mandatory will as a legal instrument that is adaptive to social needs, the reduction of potential family conflicts, the realization of maqasid syariah, and the creation of legal certainty for the recipients. This ruling reflects the harmonization between Islamic legal texts and the needs of public interest in the practice of religious courts in Indonesia.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Penelitian ini membahas penetapan wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris yang berbeda agama dengan pewaris berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) melalui Putusan Pengadilan Agama Nomor 0081/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bks. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh ketentuan hukum waris Islam yang melarang pewarisan bagi ahli waris beda agama, namun tetap memberi ruang keadilan melalui mekanisme wasiat wajibah. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merumuskan dua fokus utama yaitu, pertimbangan hakim dalam menetapkan wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non muslim, dan akibat hukum dari penetapan tersebut menurut KHI. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan, serta analisis deskriptif kualitatif berbasis sumber hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim didasarkan pada asas keadilan dan kemaslahatan dengan merujuk pada KHI serta Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 368K/AG/1998 dan 51K/AG/1999 yang menegaskan bahwa anak berbeda agama tidak berstatus sebagai ahli waris, tetapi tetap berhak menerima bagian melalui wasiat wajibah. Dengan demikian, ahli waris non muslim memang tidak memperoleh hak waris secara fiqh, tetapi tetap mendapatkan perlindungan melalui mekanisme wasiat wajibah sebagai bentuk keadilan substantif. Adapun akibat hukum penetapan wasiat wajibah menurut KHI meliputi penegasan status ahli waris non muslim sebagai penerima wasiat wajibah, pengakuan wasiat wajibah sebagai instrumen hukum yang adaptif terhadap kebutuhan sosial, berkurangnya potensi konflik keluarga, terwujudnya maqasid syariah, serta terciptanya kepastian hukum bagi penerima. Putusan ini mencerminkan harmonisasi antara teks hukum Islam dan kebutuhan kemaslahatan dalam praktik peradilan agama di Indonesia. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Mandatory Bequest, Heirs, Different Religion, Wasiat Wajibah, Ahli Waris, Beda Agama Wasiat Wajibah, Ahli Waris, Beda Agama. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Renatha Amanda Wibowo | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2026 02:30 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 07 Jan 2026 02:30 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/56812 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
