Hariprasetyo, Muhammad Fiqri (2025) KEDUDUKAN SITA UMUM PAILIT ATAS HARTA DEBITUR (BOEDEL PAILIT) YANG DISITA EKSEKUSI PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILTAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo_1111210343_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ 01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (551kB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ 02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (220kB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ 03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (100kB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ 04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (105kB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ 05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (18kB) |
|
Text
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo _ 1111210343 _ REF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (86kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo_1111210343_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (294kB) |
Abstract
General seizure is a seizure imposed by the Commercial Court as a result of a debtor being declared bankrupt, covering all of their assets, which are then managed by a curator for the benefit of creditors.Legal issues arise due to overlapping authority between the Commercial Court, which imposes general seizure on one of the bankrupt debtor's assets, and the Religious Court, which carries out execution seizure on the same object based on a sharia economic case ruling. This study aims to determine the status of general bankruptcy seizure on the debtor's assets that are subject to execution seizure by the Religious Court in bankruptcy cases and the harmonization of general bankruptcy seizure regulations by the Commercial Court with execution seizures carried out by the Religious Court. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach, a conceptual approach, and through an examination of Decision Number 20/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023/PN.Niaga.Smg. The data sources are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary materials. Data collection techniques were conducted through literature review. Data analysis was performed using qualitative analysis with a descriptive analytical approach. The results of the study indicate that between the execution seizure of the Religious Court and the general seizure in bankruptcy, what should be applied is the general seizure, taking into account the legal certainty for all creditors of PT Mitra Bersama Reality and Abdul Haris Habibi, S.Pd., as regulated in Articles 31 and 59 of the UUK-PKPU. In addition, harmonization of the Commercial Court's general seizure regulations on bankruptcy with the Religious Court's execution seizure can be achieved by affirming the Commercial Court's absolute competence over the bankruptcy estate and placing the curator as the party authorized to seize and liquidate the bankruptcy assets.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Sita umum merupakan penyitaan yang ditetapkan oleh Pengadilan Niaga sebagai akibat debitur dinyatakan pailit, yang mencakup seluruh harta kekayaannya untuk kemudian dikelola oleh kurator bagi kepentingan para kreditur. Permasalahan hukum timbul akibat adanya tumpang tindih kewenangan antara Pengadilan Niaga, yang menetapkan sita umum atas salah satu harta debitur pailit, dengan Pengadilan Agama, yang melaksanakan sita eksekusi terhadap objek yang sama berdasarkan putusan perkara ekonomi syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan sita umum pailit atas harta debitur yang disita eksekusi Pengadilan Agama dalam perkara kepailitan dan harmonisasi pengaturan sita umum kepailitan oleh Pengadilan Niaga terhadap sita eksekusi yang dilakukan oleh Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan melalui telaah terhadap Putusan Nomor 20/Pdt.Sus-Gugatan Lain-Lain/2023/PN.Niaga.Smg. Sumber data berasal dari data sekunder terdiri dari bahan primer, bahan sekunder dan bahan tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka. Analisa data dilakukan dengan analisis kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa antara sita eksekusi Pengadilan Agama dengan sita umum dalam kepailitan yang seharusnya diberlakukan adalah sita umum dengan memperhatikan nilai kepastian hukum bagi seluruh kreditur PT Mitra Bersama Reality dan Abdul Haris Habibi, S.Pd. sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 31 dan Pasal 59 UUK-PKPU. Selain itu, harmonisasi pengaturan sita umum kepailitan oleh Pengadilan Niaga terhadap sita eksekusi Pengadilan Agama dapat dicapai dengan menegaskan kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Niaga atas boedel pailit serta menempatkan kurator sebagai pihak yang berwenang melakukan penyitaan dan pemberesan harta pailit. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bankruptcy, General Seizure, Executive Seizure. Kepailitan, Sita Umum, Sita Eksekusi. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Muhammad Fiqri Hariprasetyo | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 08 Oct 2025 03:26 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2025 03:26 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/55062 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |