Nabila, Annisa Marsya (2025) TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH PT KRAKATAU STEEL TBK PADA KASUS PEMBANGUNAN BLAST FURNACE COMPLEX DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE. S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
SKRIPSI_ANNISA_MARSYA_NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
COVER-BAB I, DAFTAR PUSTAKA_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (865kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BAB II_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (391kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BAB III_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (438kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BAB IV_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (418kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BAB V_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (238kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
LAMPIRAN_SKRIPSI_ ANNISA MARSYA NABILA_1111210249.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (405kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
SKRIPSI_ANNISA_MARSYA_NABILA_1111210249_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
SKRIPSI_ANNISA_MARSYA_NABILA_1111210249_Reff.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (255kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This study examines the criminal liability of corporate management in the corruption case involving PT Krakatau Steel Tbk during the development of the Blast Furnace Complex (BFC) project, specifically in relation to the application of the Business Judgement Rule (BJR). The main focus of this research is the analysis of court decision Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Srg, which involved the former President Director of PT Krakatau Steel, Fazwar Bujang, who was found guilty of abusing his authority and causing significant financial losses to the state. Using a normative juridical approach and qualitative descriptive method, this research explores the concept of corporate criminal liability, the legal framework of BJR in corporate law, and the legal boundaries that differentiate between business risks and criminal acts. The findingsindicate that BJR offerslegal protection to directors who make business decisions in good faith, with due diligence, and without any conflict of interest. However, when abuse of authority is proven and state losses occur not solely due to business risks, BJR cannot serve as a valid defense. This study recommends strengthening the legal understanding of law enforcement officialsin distinguishing between business misjudgment and criminal offenses, and emphasizes the need for clearer regulation of corporate criminal liability within Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Law.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Penelitian ini membahas pertanggungjawaban pidana pengurus korporasi dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh PT Krakatau Steel Tbk dalam proyek pembangunan Blast Furnace Complex (BFC), dengan mengkaji keterkaitannya terhadap prinsip Business Judgement Rule (BJR). Fokus utama penelitian terletak pada analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan dalam perkara Nomor 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Srg yang melibatkan mantan Direktur Utama PT Krakatau Steel, Fazwar Bujang, atas kerugian negara yang timbul akibat keputusan bisnis perusahaan. Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan metode kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini menganalisis konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi, prinsip BJR dalam hukum perusahaan, serta batasan legal dalam membedakan risiko bisnis dan tindak pidana korupsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip BJR memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap keputusan direksi yang diambil secara wajar, itikad baik, dan tanpa konflik kepentingan. Namun, jika terbukti terjadi penyalahgunaan wewenang dan kerugian negara yang ditimbulkan bukan semata-mata akibat risiko bisnis, maka prinsip BJR tidak dapat dijadikan dasar pembelaan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan pemahaman aparat penegak hukum dalam membedakan batas antara kesalahan bisnis dan tindakan pidana, serta perlunya pengaturan yang lebih tegas dalam UU Tipikor terhadap tanggung jawab pidana korporasi dalam konteks keputusan bisnis. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Corruption, Corporation, Business Judgement Rule, Criminal Liability, PT Krakatau Steel Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Korporasi, Business Judgement Rule, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, PT Krakatau Steel | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Annisa Marsya | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 03 Sep 2025 08:26 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 03 Sep 2025 08:26 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/53278 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |