PANDIANGAN, RUT HANNA NATALIA (2025) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERGANTIAN HAKIM SELAMA PROSES PERSIDANGAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM KASUS GRATIFIKASI BPKAD (Studi Putusan Nomor 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN SRG). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_002.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_003.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_004.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (7MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_005.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (677kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_REF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (534kB) |
|
Text (Skripsi)
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_FULLTEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
RUT HANNA NATALIA PANDIANGAN_1111210211_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
Abstract
The replacement of judges in case number 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN SRG was done to prevent the trial process from being hindered, in accordance with Article 198 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, in the context of ethics, judges are obliged and must carry out their duties in finding legal facts during the trial. Judges must act carefully and with full confidence when making decisions. A judge's decision must meet the requirements of Article 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This study aims to analyze the regulation of judge replacement in Indonesia and the correlation between judge replacement and acquittal in case number 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN SRG. The theories used in this study are Gratification and Law Enforcement. The method used in this study is juridical empirical with a qualitative descriptive type. The data sources used are primary and secondary data, and the data collection techniques used are field studies using interview methods and literature research by collecting from various literatures. The results of the study show that the replacement was done to prevent the trial process from being hindered. However, the Criminal Procedure Code does not regulate how many times judge replacement can be done during the trial. The ethics of judges are obliged and must carry out their duties in finding legal facts during the trial. Although there was a replacement of judges, it did not affect the decision. The replaced judge received information about the facts of the trial through the BAS made by the clerk or directly informed by the replacing judge. The suggestion is that judges in handling cases must be more professional in their performance and the Supreme Court must increase supervision over judge replacement and the court must have a device that can record the results of the trial that has occurred automatically so that the judge who is on leave can get all the information.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Pergantian hakim dalam perkara Nomor 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN SRG dilakukan agar tidak menghambatnya jalannya persidangan, sesuai dengan Pasal 198 Ayat (1) KUHAP. Namun dalam konteks etika, hakim wajib dan harus melaksanakan tugasnya dalam menemukan fakta-fakta hukum dalam persidangan. Hakim harus bertindak hatihati dan penuh keyakinan saat menjatuhkan putusan. Suatu putusan hakim harus memuat syarat-syarat dalam pasal 198 KUHAP. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peraturan pergantian hakim di Indonesia dan korelasi antara pergantian hakim dengan putusan bebas pada perkara Nomor 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN SRG. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu Gratifikasi dan Penegakan Hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan jenis penelitian kualitatif bersifat deskriptif. Sumber data yang digunakan, yaitu data primer, data sekunder, dan data tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan, yaitu studi perpustakaan dan wawancara Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pergantian dilakukan agar tidak menghambatnya jalannya persidangan. Namun KUHAP tidak mengatur berapa kali pergantian hakim dalam persidangan boleh dilakukan. Etika hakim wajib dan harus melaksanakan tugasnya dalam menemukan fakta-fakta hukum dalam persidangan. Walaupun terjadi pergantian hakim tetapi hal tersebut tidak mempengaruhi putusan. Hakim yang digantikan mendapatkan informasi mengenai fakta-fakta di persidangan melalui BAS yang dibuat oleh panitera maupun diberitahu secara langsung oleh hakim yang menggantikan dirinya. Sarannya, yaitu hakim dalam menangani perkara harus lebih profesional terhadap kinerjanya dan Mahkamah Agung harus meningkatkan pengawasan terhadap pergantian hakim dan pengadilan harus mempunyai alat yang bisa untuk merekam hasil persidangan yang telah terjadi secara otomatis sehingga hakim yang izin bisa mendapatkan semua informasi. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Acquittal, Court, Gratification, Judge, Judge Replacement Hakim, Gratifikasi, Pengadilan, Pergantian Hakim, Putusan Bebas | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Rut Hanna Natalia Pandiangan | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2025 01:42 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2025 01:42 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/51944 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |