Search for collections on EPrints Repository UNTIRTA

WANPRESTASI OLEH PT. INDORAYA BUMI PERSADA TERHADAP PT. CEMPAKA PURI PRATAMA DALAM KONTRAK PEKERJAAN FINISHING ARSITEKTUR JATI BENING BEKASI DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN BUKU III KUHPerdata

Ramadhan, Mochammad Sovi (2025) WANPRESTASI OLEH PT. INDORAYA BUMI PERSADA TERHADAP PT. CEMPAKA PURI PRATAMA DALAM KONTRAK PEKERJAAN FINISHING ARSITEKTUR JATI BENING BEKASI DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN BUKU III KUHPerdata. S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

[img] Text
PDF Moch Sovi Ramadhan 1111190342.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (8MB)
[img] Text
Bab 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (352kB)
[img] Text
Bab 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (240kB)
[img] Text
Bab 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (213kB)
[img] Text
Bab 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB)
[img] Text
PDF Moch Sovi Ramadhan 1111190342_01.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (5MB)
[img] Text
PDF Moch Sovi Ramadhan 1111190342_Reff.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (141kB)
[img] Text
PDF Moch Sovi Ramadhan 1111190342_Lamp.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB)

Abstract

This study examines the default committed by PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada against PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama in the implementation of the architectural finishing work contract for the Terrace Jati Bening Bekasi Apartment. The identification of the problems in this study are: First, how is the default by PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada against PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama in the architectural finishing work contract for Jatibening Bekasi related to Book III of the Civil Code?. Second, what are the legal consequences of the default by PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada against PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama in the architectural finishing work contract for Jatibening Bekasi related to Book III of the Civil Code?. This study uses the theory of will (wiltstheorie) and the theory of legal certainty. The research method uses the normative legal research method supported by empirical juridical legal research. The results of this study are that PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada has committed a default by not carrying out the work according to the agreement and denying the legal commitment that has been made voluntarily. Then, the legal consequences of the default in this case are PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada is required to pay compensation, demand for cancellation of the agreement and reimbursement of costs. Meanwhile, PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama suffered financial losses, delayed completion of the contract, damage to reputation and credibility before third parties, and has the right to file a lawsuit for breach of contract to the court. The conclusion of this study is based on the theory of will, breach of contract reflects a violation of the common will stated in the work contract. Meanwhile, according to the theory of legal certainty, the provisions in the contract and the Civil Code provide a firm and predictable legal basis for the injured party to seek justice through legal channels. The author's suggestions are: First, for PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada, an internal evaluation of project management should be conducted, so that the incident of breach of contract does not recur and for PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama, it is important to include a penalty clause, a firm time limit, and alternative dispute resolution in the work contract, to minimize the risk of breach of contract and accelerate the settlement process if a dispute occurs. Second, for the government and related institutions, they can provide legal guidance for contractors regarding the risk of breach of contract and its resolution according to the Civil Code.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIP/NIM
Thesis advisorRohani, Aceng Asnawi196010251990031001
Thesis advisorAnwar, Jarkasih197003012008121002
Additional Information: Penelitian ini mengkaji wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada terhadap PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama dalam pelaksanaan kontrak pekerjaan finishing arsitektur Apartemen Terrace Jati Bening Bekasi. Adapun identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu: Pertama, bagaimana wanprestasi oleh PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada terhadap PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama dalam kontrak pekerjaan finishing arsitektur Jatibening Bekasi dihubungkan dengan buku III KUHPerdata?. Kedua, bagaimana akibat hukum wanprestasi oleh PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada terhadap PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama dalam kontrak pekerjaan finishing arsitektur Jatibening Bekasi dihubungkan dengan buku III KUHPerdata?. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori kehendak (wiltstheorie) dan teori kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif ditunjang dengan penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Adapun hasil penelitian ini bahwasanya PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada telah melakukan wanprestasi dengan tidak melaksanakan pekerjaan sesuai perjanjian dan mengingkari komitmen hukum yang telah dibuat secara sukarela. Kemudian, akibat hukum wanprestasi kasus ini yaitu PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada diwajibkan untuk membayar ganti rugi, tuntutan pembatalan perjanjian dan penggantian biaya. Sedangkan, PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama mengalami kerugian finansial, tertundanya penyelesaian kontrak, kerusakan reputasi dan kredibilitas di hadapan pihak ketiga, serta mempunyai hak untuk mengajukan gugatan wanprestasi ke pengadilan. Kesimpulan penelitian ini yaitu berdasarkan teori kehendak, wanprestasi mencerminkan pelanggaran terhadap kehendak bersama yang tertuang dalam kontrak kerja. Sedangkan, menurut teori kepastian hukum, ketentuan dalam kontrak dan KUHPerdata memberikan landasan hukum yang tegas dan dapat diprediksi bagi pihak yang dirugikan untuk menuntut keadilan melalui jalur hukum. Saran Penulis yaitu: Pertama, bagi PT. Indoraya Bumi Persada, sebaiknya dilakukan evaluasi internal terhadap manajemen proyek, agar kejadian wanprestasi tidak terulang dan bagi PT. Cempaka Puri Pratama, penting untuk mencantumkan klausul penalti, batas waktu tegas, dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dalam kontrak kerja, untuk meminimalisasi risiko wanprestasi dan mempercepat proses penyelesaian apabila sengketa terjadi. Kedua, bagi pemerintah dan lembaga terkait, dapat memberikan pembinaan hukum bagi kontraktor terkait risiko wanprestasi dan penyelesaiannya menurut KUHPerdata.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Default, Construction Contract, Compensation Wanprestasi, Kontrak Konstruksi, Ganti Rugi
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: 01-Fakultas Hukum
01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Mr MOCHAMMAD SOVI RAMADHAN
Date Deposited: 13 Aug 2025 03:54
Last Modified: 13 Aug 2025 03:54
URI: http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/51799

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item