RAMADHANI, NIDA NONI (2025) ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP SAKSI A CHARGE YANG TIDAK PERNAH DIPERIKSA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 22/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PN SRG. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (211kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (229kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (171kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (39kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (62kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_REF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (189kB) |
|
Text
NIDA NONI RAMADHANI_1111210061_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (727kB) |
Abstract
The disclosure of truth in criminal law is important for justice, but the neglect of witnesses a charge can undermine the judicial process so as to result in a free verdict on the number 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg and lower public confidence in law enforcement. The main problem studied in this study is that any factors that cause proof by prosecutors do not convince the judge in the verdict number 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg and how the juridical implications of the unexamined witness a charge against the validity of legal proceedings and court rulings in the case of corruption of the verdict number 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg. Theories in this study use due process of law theory and proof theory. This study was conducted using normative juridical methods. The data source used uses secondary data sources consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The study results in that proof of the Prosecutor’s prosecutor did not go to the maximum, especially because there were no witnesses such as Restia Dian Aini. The absence of witnesses a charge and weak submission of evidence indicates a lack of compliance with the principle of due process of law and a clear proof foundation in criminal law. The conclusion of this study was freely imposed because prosecutors failed to present evidence and witnesses a charge, so they were unable to convince the judge. This reflects the weak proof and lowers public confidence in judiciary. The advice of this study is that legal process must be fair and transparent, and proper management of evidence.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Pengungkapan kebenaran dalam hukum pidana penting untuk keadilan, namun pengabaian terhadap saksi a charge dapat melemahkan proses peradilan sehingga menghasilkan putusan bebas pada perkara nomor 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg dan menurunkan kepercayaan publik terhadap penegakan hukum. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini yaitu apa saja faktor yang menyebabkan pembuktian oleh jaksa tidak menyakinkan hakim dalam putusan nomor 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg dan bagaimana implikasi yuridis dari tidak diperiksanya saksi a charge terhadap keabsahan proses hukum dan putusan pengadilan dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi putusan nomor 22/pid.sus-tpk/2023/pn srg. Teori dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori due process of law dan teori pembuktian. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Sumber data yang digunakan menggunakan sumber data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Penelitian ini menghasilkan bahwa pembuktian Jaksa Penuntut Umum tidak berjalan maksimal, terutama karena tidak dihadirkannya saksi seperti Restia Dian Aini. Ketidakhadiran saksi a charge serta lemahnya pengajuan alat bukti menunjukkan kurangnya kepatuhan terhadap prinsip due process of law dan asas pembuktian yang jelas dalam hukum pidana. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini putusan bebas dijatuhkan karena jaksa gagal menghadirkan bukti dan saksi a charge, sehingga tidak mampu meyakinkan hakim. Hal ini mencerminkan lemahnya pembuktian dan menurunkan kepercayaan publik terhadap peradilan. Saran dari penelitian ini yaitu proses hukum harus adil dan transparan, serta pengelolaan bukti yang tepat. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | proof, pn serang, witness a charge, criminal corruption. pembuktian, pn serang, saksi a charge, tindak pidana korupsi. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | NONI RAMADHANI NIDA | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2025 02:45 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2025 02:45 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/50532 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |