PRATIKA, MELLA (2024) TINJAUAN PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PEMBATALAN PIDANA MATI TERPIDANA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA PADA TINGKAT BANDING MELALUI PERSPEKTIF PEMIDANAAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT/BTN). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_Fullteks.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (10MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (9MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (204kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (205kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (289kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (72kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (139kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Mella Pratika_1111170024_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (26kB) |
Abstract
The criminal offense of narcotics in Indonesia remains a significant problem for society, yet the imposition of the death penalty against narcotics offenders continues to be debated. This is evident in the cancellation of the death penalty in Decision Number: 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT/BTN. The problem identified in this research is: What are the considerations of the judges regarding the cancellation of the death penalty carried out by the Appeals Court judges in Decision Number 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN, and how is the theoretical review of punishment towards the substitute decision rendered by the High Court judges in Decision Number 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN conducted. The theories utilized in this research are judge's considerations theory and punishment theory. The method employed in this research is normative juridical research method, with the research specification utilizing descriptive analytical approach. The findings of this research indicate that the cancellation of the death penalty in Decision Number 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN by the Banten High Court is not in accordance with the legal provisions that establish the minimum threshold for the death penalty related to narcotics, where the amount of narcotics found on the defendant far exceeds that threshold. Even though the defendant denies possessing narcotics and there is no evidence of payment transfer, the fact remains that narcotics were found in their possession, along with a significant amount, which should have been sufficient to warrant the imposition of the death penalty.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Tindak Pidana narkotika sampai saat ini masih menjadi masalah yang besar untuk masyarakat Indonesia, meskipun demikian penjatuhan pidana mati terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika masih menjadi perdebatan. Seperti halnya pada pembatalan pidana mati pada Putusan Nomor: 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT/BTN. Identifikasi masalah pada penelitian ini yaitu adalah Bagaimana pertimbangan hakim atas pembatalan pidana mati yang dilakukan oleh Hakim Pengadilan tingkat banding pada putusan nomor 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN dan Bagaimana tinjauan teori pemidanaan terhadap putusan pengganti yang dijatuhkan oleh Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi pada putusan Nomor 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori pertimbangan hakim dan teori pemidanaan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif, spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian ini Pembatalan pidana mati dalam putusan Nomor 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN oleh Pengadilan Tinggi Banten tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang menetapkan batas minimal untuk pidana mati terkait narkotika, dimana jumlah narkotika yang ditemukan pada terdakwa jauh melampaui batas tersebut. Meskipun terdakwa tidak mengakui kepemilikan narkotika dan tidak ada bukti transfer pembayaran, faktanya narkotika ditemukan pada mereka, bersama dengan jumlah yang signifikan, sehingga seharusnya sudah cukup untuk menetapkan penjatuhan pidana mati. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Narcotics, High Court, Appeals, Death Penalt Narkotika, Pengadilan Tinggi, Banding, Pidana Mati. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Mella Pratika | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2024 10:50 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 10 Aug 2024 10:50 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/39195 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |