Putri Ardiningsih, Salsa (2024) PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU RESIDIVIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP) (Studi Putusan Nomor: 395/Pid.B/2023/PN JKT.BRT). S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

	Text Skripsi Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (364kB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (379kB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (346kB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (134kB)
	Text Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (272kB)
	Text (Skripsi) Salsa Putri Ardiningsih_1111200342_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (149kB)

Abstract

The perpetrator of motorcycle theft often does his actions repeatedly. The application of criminal sanctions that tend to be less strict can cause the perpetrators of the criminal act of motor vehicle theft to continue to exist every year. While the threat against the recidivist perpetrators has been regulated in the Criminal Code. The identification of the problem in this research is how the provisions of the elements of criminal acts that are considered by the judge in the punishment of the perpetrators of residivis crimes of motor vehicle theft and how to apply criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of recidivis crimes of motor vehicle theft according to the code of criminal law (KUHP). The theory used is the theory of judge consideration and the theory of the purpose of punishment. The method used is a normative juridical research method, with the research specifications used being the statutory approach and case studies. The data source used is secondary data which consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, with library study data collection techniques. The results of the research obtained were the application of articles that were not appropriate by the panel of judges against the perpetrators of recidivist theft so that the goal of the conviction was not achieved, namely the deterrent effect. Meanwhile, the provisions for the recidivist perpetrators have been written in Article 486,487,488 of the Criminal Code regarding the threat of the law, but in practice the application of the articles set by the Panel of judges is not appropriate if based on the facts revealed in the court. The conclusion that the application of criminal sanctions set by the Panel of judges against the perpetrators of residivis theft is not in accordance with Article 486 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the perpetrator has fulfilled all elements of criminal acts. The researcher's advice is that law enforcement should consider more aspects of justice so that the perpetrator does not repeat his actions again

Item Type:	Thesis (S1)
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors NIP/NIM Thesis advisor Asphianto, Aan 196301052002121002
Additional Information:	Pelaku pencurian sepeda motor tidak jarang melakukan perbuatannya berulang kali. Penerapan sanksi pidana yang cenderung kurang tegas dapat menyebabkan para pelaku residivis tindak pidana pencurian kendaraan bermotor terus ada pada setiap tahunnya. Sedangkan ancaman terhadap pelaku residivis telah diatur dalam Kitab undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Identifikasi masalah pada penelitian ini adalah bagaimana ketentuan unsur-unsur tindak pidana yang menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam pemidanaan terhadap pelaku residivis tindak pidana pencurian kendaraan bermotor dan bagaimana penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku residivis tindak pidana pencurian kendaraan bermotor menurut kitab undang-undang hukum pidana (KUHP). Teori yang digunakan adalah teori pertimbangan hakim dan teori tujuan pemidanaan. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang di dalamnya terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan yaitu penerapan pasal yang belum sesuai oleh Majelis hakim terhadap pelaku pencurian residivis sehingga tidak tercapainya tujuan dari pemidanaan yaitu efek jera. Sedangkan ketentuan bagi pelaku residivis telah tertulis pada Pasal 486,487,488 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana perihal ancaman hukumunnya tetapi pada praktiknya penerapan pasal yang ditetapkan Majelis hakim kurang sesuai jika berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan. Kesimpulan bahwa penerapan sanksi pidana yang ditetapkan oleh Majelis hakim terhadap pelaku pencurian residivis belum sesuai berdasakan Pasal 486 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan pelaku telah memenuhi seluruh unsur tindak pidana. Saran peneliti adalah penegakan hukum harus lebih mempertimbangkan aspek keadilan agar pelaku tidak mengulangi perbuatannya kembali.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Sanctions, Thieves, Recidivis Sanksi, Pencuriam, Residivis
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	Salsa Putri Ardiningsih
Date Deposited:	06 Aug 2024 14:31
Last Modified:	06 Aug 2024 14:31
URI:	http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/38815

Actions (login required)

View Item