DYAH AYU PUSPORINI, RISKA (2023) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMILIK MEREK TERKENAL SUPREME BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (182kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (286kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (217kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (271kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (128kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI_1111170095_FULLtext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Well-known brand disputes still occur frequently in several countries, including Indonesia. Like the famous brand battle that occurred recently in Indonesia, namely the battle between Supreme from New York and SUPREME from Jakarta involving Chapter 4 Corp as the Plaintiff and Husein Thamrin as the Defendant. Prosecuting the "SUPREME" brand with trademark registration number IDM000707556 in class 25 types of apparel, bras, socks, shoes, sandals, waistbands and others. Production issues, namely, how is the legal protection for well-known brand rights in recording the brand "Supreme" owned by Chapter 4 Corp against SUPREME owned by Husein Thamrin in terms of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications? Second, what is the basis of the judge's legal considerations in rejecting the Plaintiff's lawsuit in applying for the famous mark "Supreme" in the decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 10/Pdt.Sus-Brand/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst according to Law Number 20 of 2016 about Brands and Geographical Indications?. The legal theories used are the theory of legal protection and the theory of certainty. The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The research specifications used are a statutory and regulatory approach and a case approach, data sources are secondary data, data collection techniques are literature studies, data analysis is qualitative analysis. The results of the research can be concluded that the legal considerations of the Commercial Court judges in decision Number 10/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. which says the lawsuit cannot be accepted because the lawsuit has expired, is not correct. Husein Thamrin's application for registration of the SUPREME trademark should be rejected because it is substantially or completely similar to the well-known trademark owned by Chapter 4 Corp. In contrast to the judge's consideration in the cassation conclusion which is in accordance with the Legislative Regulations, which is based on truth and justice with the aim of ensuring legal certainty for the parties involved, with this cassation decision the "Supreme" brand belongs to the Plaintiff as the owner of a well-known brand has received legal protection.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Sengketa merek terkenal masih sering terjadi di beberapa negara termasuk di Indonesia. Seperti sengketa merek terkenal yang terjadi belakangan ini di Indonesia yaitu sengketa antara Supreme asal New York dan SUPREME asal Jakarta yang melibatkan Chapter 4 Corp sebagai Penggugat serta Husein Thamrin sebagai Tergugat. Memperkarakan merek “SUPREME” dengan pendaftaran merek Nomer IDM000707556 pada kelas 25 jenis barang Pakaian jadi, kutang (BH), kaos kaki, sepatu, sandal, ban pinggang, dan lainnya. Identifikasi masalah yaitu Bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap hak merek terkenal dalam sengketa merek “Supreme” milik Chapter 4 Corp melawan SUPREME milik Husein Thamrin ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis? Yang kedua apa dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menolak gugatan Penggugat dalam sengketa merek terkenal “Supreme” pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 10/Pdt.Sus- Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis?. Teori hukum yang digunakan adalah teori perlindungan hukum dan teori kepastian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah penelitian yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, sumber data berupa data sekunder, Teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan, analisis data berupa analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pertimbangan hukum hakim Pengadilan Niaga pada putusan Nomor 10/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. yang mengatakan gugatan tak bisa diterima Karena gugatan telah daluarsa, adalah kurang tepat. Permohonan pendaftaran merek SUPREME milik Husein Thamrin yang seharusnya ditolak karena memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya dengan merek terkenal milik Chapter 4 Corp. Berbeda halnya dengan Pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan kasasi yang telah sesuai dengan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, yang berlandaskan pada kebenaran dan keadilan dengan tujuannya yakni agar terlaksanakannya kepastian hukum bagi pihak yang terkait, dengan adanya putusan kasasi ini merek “Supreme” milik Penggugat sebagai pemilik merek terkenal telah mendapatkan perlindungan hukum. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Famous Brands, Legal Protection, Brand Disputes Merek Terkenal, Perlindungan Hukum, Sengketa Merek | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Ms RISKA DYAH AYU PUSPORINI | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2024 09:38 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 21 Feb 2024 09:38 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/33252 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |