Rachmaniah, Andhini (2023) IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG (MA) TERHADAP TATA KELOLA BADAN PENYELENGGARA JAMINAN SOSIAL (BPJS) BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG (MA) NOMOR 7 P/HUM/2020. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (481kB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (291kB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (423kB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (12kB) |
|
Text
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (266kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Andhini Rachmaniah_1111180350_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (366kB) |
Abstract
The Health Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) was formed as a form of state responsibility in providing social security for the basic needs of the Indonesian people based on humanitarian principles and the mandate of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Health services intend to be one of the services in the health aspect with the insurance system. Consideration of Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020 attaches several governance issues. However, after the Supreme Court Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020, the government continued to issue Presidential Regulation Number 64 of 2020 concerning the Increase in BPJS Contributions. The judges' considerations in Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020 should have focused more on governance and the procedure for making a Presidential Decree which only relied on deficit findings and the best way was to increase contributions. The identification of the problem is how are the judges' considerations in the Supreme Court's (MA) decision regarding the governance of the Social Security Administration Agency (BPJS)? Furthermore, how is the implementation of the governance of the Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) after the Supreme Court decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020. The theory used in this research is the theory of good governance and welfare theory. The research methodology is normative juridical. The data source used is Secondary Data in the form of analysis results and expert opinion on law, laws and regulations and opinions on court decisions. The results of this study are the basis for the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges according to the juridical, sociological, and philosophical aspects of the Supreme Court Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020 in accordance with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning Guarantee Agency. Social and implications for improving BPJS governance. The conclusion of the Judge's Considerations in the Supreme Court (MA) Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020 Regarding the Governance of the Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) is a decision that is in accordance with legal considerations and the theories used by researchers. The suggestion for this research is to structure BPJS Kesehatan and provide services to the community and the President should heed the Supreme Court Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020 and improve regulations and governance of BPJS Kesehatan.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan dibentuk sebagai bentuk tanggung jawab negara dalam memberikan jaminan sosial untuk kebutuhan dasar masyarakat Indonesia berdasarkan asas kemanusiaan dan amanat Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Pelayanan kesehatan bermaksud untuk menjadi salah satu pelayanan didalam aspek kesehatan dengan sistem asuransi. Pertimbangan Putusan Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 melampirkan beberapa permasalahan tata kelola. Tetapi, pasca Putusan MA Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 pemerintah tetap mengeluarkan Perpres Nomor 64 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kenaikan Iuran BPJS. Seharusnya dalam pertimbangan hakim didalam Putusan Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 lebih menitik beratkan kepada tata kelola dan prosedur pembuatan Perpres yang hanya mengandalkan temuan defisit dan cara terbaik adalah menaikan iuran. Adapun identifikasi masalahnya adalah Bagaimanakah pertimbangan Hakim dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung (MA) terhadap tata kelola Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS)? Selanjutnya Bagaimanakah implementasi tata kelola Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Pasca putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020. Teori yang digunakan penelitian yaitu, teori good governance dan teori kesejahteraan. Metodologi penelitian yaitu yuridis normatif. Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu Data Sekunder berupa hasil analisis dan pendapat pakar hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendapat atas putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Dasar pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim menurut aspek yuridis, sosiologis, dan aspek filosofis Putusan MA Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial serta implikasi untuk memperbaiki tata kelola BPJS. Kesimpulan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung (MA) Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 Terhadap Tata Kelola Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) adalah putusan yang sesuai dengan pertimbangan hukum dan teori-teori yang digunakan peneliti. Adapun Saran penelitian ini adalah kepada struktur BPJS Kesehatan serta memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat dan Presiden hendaknya mengindahkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 serta memperbaiki regulasi dan tata kelola BPJS Kesehatan. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Kata Kunci: Tata Kelola BPJS, Putusan Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 Keywords: BPJS Governance, Decision Number 7 P/HUM/2020. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Andhini Rachmaniah | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2023 16:26 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2023 16:26 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/22097 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |