CHARLIE VIRGO G. M., AIROBE (2022) TINJAUAN TERHADAP LISENSI HAK SIAR YANG DIMILIKI OLEH PT. INTER SPORTS MARKETING ATAS PELANGGARAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PT. CITIHUB INDONESIA d/a CITIHUB HOTEL YOGYAKARTA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA ( Analisis Putusan Kasasi Nomor 110 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
COVER.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (646kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (699kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (689kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (671kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (517kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (520kB) |
Abstract
PT. Inter Sports Marketing telah melakukan kekeliruan dalam perkara ini. Pihak Penggugat beranggapan bahwa ada hak mereka yang telah dilanggar oleh Tergugat yaitu, PT. Citihub Indonesia d/a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta. Tergugat dianggap telah melakukan kesalahan karena telah menyiarkan siaran Piala Dunia 2014, Brazil di setiap kamar Hotel. PT. Inter Sports Marketing beranggapan bahwa seharusnya mereka menerima Hak Ekonomi dari Lisensi Hak Siar Piala Dunia yang mereka miliki pada saat itu. Mereka menilai kamar Hotel merupakan area komersil, yang mana secara tidak langsung PT. Citihub Indonesia d/a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta dianggap telah memanfaatkan Hak Ekonomi dari Hak Cipta yang mereka miliki. Pada tahap pertama di Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Semarang, pihak Penggugat merasa puas dengan keputusan Hakim. Karena hasil putusan nya mengatakan bahwa PT. Citihub Indonesia d/a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta harus mengganti kerugian sebesar Rp. 1.000.000.000 (Satu Miliar Rupiah). Namun, pihak tergugat tidak terima dengan keputusan tersebut. Sehingga mereka akhirnya mengajukan Kasasi. Disinilah peran dari Kepastian Hukum terlihat jelas. Sesuai dengan pandangan Utrecht, Kepastian Hukum adalah adanya aturan yang bersifat umum yang membuat individu mengetahui perbuatan apa yang boleh atau tidak boleh dilakukan. Hakim Mahkamah Agung menilai tidak ada pelanggaran Hukum yang dilakukan oleh PT. Citihub Indonesia d/a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta. vi Penayangan Piala Dunia 2014 Brazil yang ada pada setiap kamar Hotel bukanlah Pelanggaran Hak Cipta. Karena pihak Hotel tidak memungut biaya tambahan apapun dalam penayangan tersebut. Itu artinya, PT. Citihub Indonesia d/a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta tidak ada menerima Royalti dari Lisensi Hak Siar yang dimiliki oleh PT. Inter Sports Marketing
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | PT. Inter Sports Marketing has made a mistake in this matter. The Plaintiff is of the opinion that their rights have been violated by the Defendant, namely, PT. Citihub Indonesia d / a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta. The defendant was deemed to have made a mistake because he had broadcast the 2014 World Cup Brazil broadcast in every hotel room. PT. Inter Sports Marketing thought that they should have received the Economic Rights of the World Cup Broadcasting Rights License they had at the time. They considered the hotel room to be a commercial area, which indirectly PT. Citihub Indonesia d / a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta is deemed to have utilized the Economic Rights of their copyrights. In the first phase at the Commercial Court at the Semarang District Court, the Plaintiff was satisfied with the Judge's decision. Because the verdict said that PT. Citihub Indonesia d / a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta must compensate a loss of Rp. 1,000,000,000 (One Billion Rupiah). However, the defendant did not accept this decision. So they finally filed an appeal. This is where the role of legal certainty becomes clear. In accordance with Utrecht's view, legal certainty is the existence of general rules that make individuals know what actions can or should not be done. The judges of the Supreme vii Court considered that there were no violations of the law committed by PT. Citihub Indonesia d / a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta. The screening of the 2014 Brazil World Cup in every hotel room is not a copyright infringement. Because the hotel does not charge any additional fees for the broadcast. That means, PT. Citihub Indonesia d / a Citihub Hotel Yogyakarta does not receive Royalties from the Broadcast Rights License owned by PT. Inter Sports Marketing. Keywords : Copyright, Legal Certainty, Broadcast Rights License, 2014 World Cup Brazil | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Kata Kunci : Hak Cipta, Kepastian Hukum, Lisensi Hak Siar, Piala Dunia 2014 Brazil | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Perpustakaan Pusat | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2022 09:34 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 18 Jul 2022 09:34 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/14541 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |