ROYANI, AHMAD (2022) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN YANG TELAH DINYATAKAN BATAL DEMI HUKUM OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG KARENA HAKIM PENGADILAN TINGGI (JUDEX FACTIE) TELAH MENGABAIKAN ASAS BERACARA DI DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN PERKARA SENGKETA TANAH WARIS. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

	Text COVER.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (660kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (717kB)
	Text BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (958kB)
	Text BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (561kB)
	Text BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (497kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (554kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)

Abstract

Wiyanto Halim adalah pemilik hak atas sebidang tanah berdasarkan 5 Akta Jual Beli, kemudian wiyanto halim mengajukan permohonan pendaftaran konversi hak atas tanah ke kantor BPN Kota Tangerang, setelah di teliti ternyata sudah terbit SHM No. 49/Benda dan SHM No.51/Benda, berdasarkan data tersebut, BPN Kota Tangerang tidak dapat memproses pendaftaran konversi hak atas tanah, BPN akan memperoses jika SHM No. 49/Benda dan SHM No. 51/Benda tersebut dilakukan pembatalan. Atas dasar tersebut, maka wiyanto halim membawa sengketa tanah ini ke pengadilan, identifikasi masalah yang pertama Apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan peninjauan Kembali No. 52 PK/PDT/2018 sudah tepat menurut hukum? Dan selanjutnya Bagaimana akibat hukum dari putusan peninjauan Kembali No. 52 PK/PDT/2018? Metode dalam penyusunan skripsi ini peneliti menggunakan tipe penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual berdasarkan data sekunder yang ditunjang dengan data primer. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan studi dokumen. Data di analisis dengan metode yuridis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian dari putusan mahkamah agung No. 52/K/PDT/2018 Jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2957/K/PDT/2015. Jo. Pengadilan Tinggi Banten No. 16/PDT/2015/PT.BTN. Jo. Pengadilan Negeri No. 645/Pdt.G/2013/Pn.TNG. dalam pertimbangannya Wiyanto Halim tidak mempunyai alas hak untuk didaftarkan sertifikat, karena Wiyanto Halim sudah menjual ke-5 AJB yang ingin ia daftarkan ke kantor BPN Kota Tangerang tersebut sudah terdaftar SHM No. 49/Benda dan SHM No. 51/Benda atas nama tergugat IV Nngsih Rahardja selaku ahli waris dari alm. Surja Mihardja.

Item Type:	Thesis (S1)
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors NIP/NIM Thesis advisor PRIHARTONO, AGUS 197904192002121002 Thesis advisor EFRIYANTO, EFRIYANTO 197204162002121002
Additional Information:	Wiyanto Halim is the owner of the rights to a plot of land based on 5 Deeds of Sale and Purchase, then Wiyanto Halim submitted an application for registration of the conversion of land rights to the Tangerang City BPN office. 49/Benda and SHM No.51/Benda, based on these data, Tangerang City BPN cannot process the registration of land rights conversion, BPN will process if SHM No. 49/Bob and SHM No. 51/The object is canceled. On this basis, Wiyanto Halim brought this land dispute to court. The first problem identification was. What was the judge's consideration in the judicial review decision no. 52 PK/PDT/2018 is it legal? And then what are the legal consequences of the judicial review decision no. 52 PK/PDT/2018? The method in the preparation of this thesis the researcher uses a normative juridical legal research type with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach based on secondary data supported by primary data. Data collection techniques with document studies. The data were analyzed using qualitative juridical methods. The results of the research from the decision of the supreme court no. 52/K/PDT/2018 Jo. Supreme Court Decision No. 2957/K/PDT/2015. Jo. Banten High Court No. 16/PDT/2015/PT.BTN. Jo. District Court No. 645/Pdt.G/2013/Pn.TNG. In his consideration, Wiyanto Halim did not have the right to register the certificate, because Wiyanto Halim had already sold the 5 AJBs he wanted to register at the Tangerang City BPN office. 49/Bob and SHM No. 51/Benda on behalf of the defendant IV Nngsih Rahardja as the heir of the late. Surja Mihardja. Keywords: Dispute, Judge's Decision, Judge's Consideration, Tangerang City BPN
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Kata Kunci: Sengketa, Putusan Hakim, Pertimbangan Hakim, BPN Kota Tangerang
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	Perpustakaan Pusat
Date Deposited:	04 Aug 2022 14:18
Last Modified:	04 Aug 2022 14:18
URI:	http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/15252

Actions (login required)

View Item