<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>KEBIJAKAN STRUKTURAL PENGELUARAN PEMERINTAH&#13;
(GOVERNMENT SPENDING) DAN PERFORMA MAKRO EKONOMI&#13;
WILAYAH DI INDONESIA</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Wildan</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Hanief</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study aims to analyze the influence of Total Government Expenditure&#13;
(TGS), Government Capital Expenditure (CGS), Government Operational&#13;
Expenditure (OGS), and Population Density (PD) on macroeconomic performance&#13;
across regions in Indonesia, including economic growth, poverty, unemployment,&#13;
income inequality, and the Human Development Index (HDI). The study employs&#13;
panel data estimation using the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) over a&#13;
specific period.&#13;
The results reveal that government operational expenditure (OGS) has a&#13;
positive and significant impact on economic growth, while total government&#13;
expenditure (TGS) surprisingly exerts a significant negative effect. Regarding&#13;
poverty, both capital expenditure (CGS) and operational expenditure (OGS)&#13;
significantly reduce poverty levels, consistent with expectations, in contrast to the&#13;
positive effect of TGS that contradicts the hypothesis. For unemployment, capital&#13;
(CGS) and operational expenditures (OGS) unexpectedly contribute positively and&#13;
significantly, contrary to the hypothesis, whereas TGS reduces unemployment as&#13;
anticipated. Income inequality significantly decreases with increased capital&#13;
expenditure (CGS), with other variables showing no significant effects. Population&#13;
density (PD) positively affects unemployment and HDI. Overall, government&#13;
capital expenditure proves effective in promoting economic growth and reducing&#13;
poverty and inequality, but total and operational expenditures require policy&#13;
evaluation to enhance their effectiveness in human development and unemployment&#13;
reduction. Optimizing government expenditure allocation is imperative to achieve&#13;
more inclusive and sustainable development.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">H Social Sciences (General)</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2025</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA;MAGISTER EKONOMI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>