relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/
title: ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN WARALABA  RESTORAN HOGHOCK DITINJAU MENURUT PERATURAN  MENTERI PERDAGANGAN NOMOR 71 TAHUN 2019  TENTANG PENYELENGGARA WARALABA  (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Jkt.Utr)
creator: Yuniastin Novia, Anggraini
subject: K Law (General)
description: Franchising as a business model has grown rapidly in Indonesia, particularly in  the restaurant sector. However, franchise practices are not free from the risk of  disputes, one of which is the termination of a franchise agreement due to  violations of applicable regulations. The termination of the Hoghock restaurant  franchise agreement is based on Decision Number 3/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Jkt.Utr.  This case originated from violations of the Minister of Trade Regulation Number  71 of 2019 concerning Franchise Organizers, which governs the obligations of the  parties in carrying out franchise relationships.. How is the responsibility of PT  Kuliner Indonesia for the agreement made by Ms. Imelda, who failed to provide  the required fee and committed a breach of contract (wanprestasi), in relation to  Minister of Trade Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Franchise  Organizers and Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection?, How is the  legal dispute regarding the termination of the Hoghock restaurant franchise  agreement resolved through Decision Number 3/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Jkt.Utr?, The  research method used in this study is normative juridical. The research  specification applied in this thesis is descriptive-analytical, namely by describing  the relevant laws and regulations and relating them to positive legal theories  associated with the issues. The Defendant’s responsibility concerns the execution  of the agreement that was not carried out in accordance with the terms agreed  upon, including the obligation to pay fees, the implementation of operational  standards, and the franchisor’s obligation to provide guidance. The resulting  dispute caused actual losses to the Plaintiff. The panel of judges at the North  Jakarta District Court declared the franchise agreement null and void by  operation of law and ordered compensation, reflecting the application of  restorative justice principles and the protection of the franchisee’s rights
date: 2026
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/1/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_Fulltext..pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/2/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_01..pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/3/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_02.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/4/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_03.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/5/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_04.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/6/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_05.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/7/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_Ref.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/58805/8/Yuniastin%20Novia%20Anggraini_1111210045_Lamp.pdf
identifier:   Yuniastin Novia, Anggraini  (2026) ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN WARALABA RESTORAN HOGHOCK DITINJAU MENURUT PERATURAN MENTERI PERDAGANGAN NOMOR 71 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PENYELENGGARA WARALABA (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Jkt.Utr).  S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.