eprintid: 57481 rev_number: 18 eprint_status: archive userid: 10170 dir: disk0/00/05/74/81 datestamp: 2026-04-30 07:55:53 lastmod: 2026-04-30 07:55:53 status_changed: 2026-04-30 07:55:53 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Yanti, Zhahrina creators_id: 2224210086 contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_name: SARI, INDAH JUWITA contributors_name: Rifqiawati, Ika contributors_id: 201508312065 contributors_id: 201508312066 corp_creators: UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA corp_creators: FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN corp_creators: JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI title: PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY DALAM MENINGKATKAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH PADA KONSEP PENERAPAN BIOTEKNOLOGI ispublished: pub subjects: L1 subjects: LB2300 divisions: Biologi full_text_status: restricted note: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik kelas X pada materi penerapan bioteknologi. Metode yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan desain non-equivalent control group. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari dua kelas, yaitu kelas eksperimen yang menggunakan model ADI dan kelas kontrol yang menggunakan Discovery Learning. Instrumen penelitian berupa soal uraian berjumlah tiga butir yang mengukur indikator argumentasi ilmiah: claim, data, dan warrant. Hasil uji hipotesis melalui uji non parametrik menggunakan uji Mann Whitney U dan mendapat nilai Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) 0,000. Hasil analisis N-Gain kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,64 (kategori sedang), sedangkan kelas kontrol sebesar 0,27 (kategori rendah). Peningkatan terbesar terdapat pada indikator warrant, sementara indikator data memiliki rata-rata skor terendah. Analisis LKPD dan laporan praktikum menunjukkan bahwa peserta didik di kelas eksperimen mampu menyusun argumen tertulis secara lebih lengkap dan sistematis dibandingkan kelas kontrol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model ADI memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik, terutama dalam proses penyusunan argumen dan laporan investigasi yang menuntut pemikiran kritis berbasis bukti. abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model on the scientific argumentation skills of tenth-grade students in learning the application of biotechnology. A quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design was employed. The research subjects consisted of two classes: an experimental class taught using the ADI model and a control class taught using the Discovery Learning model. The research instrument comprised three essay questions designed to assess scientific argumentation indicators, namely claim, data, and warrant. Hypothesis testing was conducted using a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test, which yielded an Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000. The N-Gain analysis showed that the experimental class achieved an N-Gain score of 0.64 (moderate category), while the control class obtained an N-Gain score of 0.27 (low category). The greatest improvement was observed in the warrant indicator, whereas the data indicator had the lowest average score. Analysis of students’ worksheets and laboratory reports indicated that students in the experimental class were able to construct written arguments in a more complete and systematic manner compared to those in the control class. Overall, the results demonstrate that the ADI model has a positive effect on students’ scientific argumentation skills, particularly in the processes of argument construction and investigation reporting that require evidence-based critical thinking. date: 2026 date_type: published pages: 204 institution: UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGUNG TIRTAYASA department: Pendidikan Biologi thesis_type: sarjana thesis_name: sarjana citation: Yanti, Zhahrina (2026) PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY DALAM MENINGKATKAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH PADA KONSEP PENERAPAN BIOTEKNOLOGI. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGUNG TIRTAYASA. document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/1/Zhahrina%20Yanti_222421006_FULL%20TEXT.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/2/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_01.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/3/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_02.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/4/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_03.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/5/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_04.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/6/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_05.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/7/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_Ref.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/8/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_Lamp.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/9/Zhahrina%20Yanti_2224210086_CP.pdf