TY  - THES
TI  - PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY DALAM MENINGKATKAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH PADA KONSEP PENERAPAN BIOTEKNOLOGI
N2  - This study aims to determine the effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model 
on the scientific argumentation skills of tenth-grade students in learning the 
application of biotechnology. A quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent 
control group design was employed. The research subjects consisted of two classes: 
an experimental class taught using the ADI model and a control class taught using 
the Discovery Learning model. The research instrument comprised three essay 
questions designed to assess scientific argumentation indicators, namely claim, 
data, and warrant. Hypothesis testing was conducted using a non-parametric 
Mann?Whitney U test, which yielded an Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000. The 
N-Gain analysis showed that the experimental class achieved an N-Gain score of 
0.64 (moderate category), while the control class obtained an N-Gain score of 0.27 
(low category). The greatest improvement was observed in the warrant indicator, 
whereas the data indicator had the lowest average score. Analysis of students? 
worksheets and laboratory reports indicated that students in the experimental class 
were able to construct written arguments in a more complete and systematic manner 
compared to those in the control class. Overall, the results demonstrate that the ADI 
model has a positive effect on students? scientific argumentation skills, particularly 
in the processes of argument construction and investigation reporting that require 
evidence-based critical thinking.
ID  - eprintuntirta57481
N1  - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model Argument-Driven 
Inquiry (ADI) terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik kelas X pada 
materi penerapan bioteknologi. Metode yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen 
dengan desain non-equivalent control group. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari dua 
kelas, yaitu kelas eksperimen yang menggunakan model ADI dan kelas kontrol 
yang menggunakan Discovery Learning. Instrumen penelitian berupa soal uraian 
berjumlah tiga butir yang mengukur indikator argumentasi ilmiah: claim, data, dan 
warrant. Hasil uji hipotesis melalui uji non parametrik menggunakan uji Mann 
Whitney U dan mendapat nilai Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) 0,000. Hasil analisis N-Gain 
kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,64 (kategori sedang), sedangkan kelas kontrol sebesar 
0,27 (kategori rendah). Peningkatan terbesar terdapat pada indikator warrant, 
sementara indikator data memiliki rata-rata skor terendah. Analisis LKPD dan 
laporan praktikum menunjukkan bahwa peserta didik di kelas eksperimen mampu 
menyusun argumen tertulis secara lebih lengkap dan sistematis dibandingkan kelas 
kontrol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model ADI memberikan pengaruh 
positif terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik, terutama dalam 
proses penyusunan argumen dan laporan investigasi yang menuntut pemikiran kritis 
berbasis bukti.
M1  - sarjana
EP  - 204
A1  - Yanti, Zhahrina
AV  - restricted
Y1  - 2026///
UR  - https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/57481/
PB  - UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGUNG TIRTAYASA
ER  -