<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN INVESTASI SKEMA &#13;
PIRAMIDA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN&#13;
KONSUMEN NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN &#13;
KONSUMEN JO UNDANG-UNDANG PERDAGANGAN &#13;
NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERDAGANGAN</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Syifa Zalfa</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Swargana</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Investment is an activity of capital placement aimed at obtaining &#13;
substantial profits. However, many business or investment mechanisms are &#13;
subsequently carried out illegally and in violation of the law. One such illegal &#13;
activity is known as a pyramid scheme. The term “pyramid scheme” is explicitly &#13;
regulated in Law Number 7 of 2014 on Trade and is also implicitly reflected in &#13;
Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, particularly Article 1 paragraph &#13;
(1). The phenomenon of investment fraud within society often disguises itself as &#13;
legitimate investment transactions, including pyramid schemes. Based on this &#13;
background, the research problems are identified as follows: (1) how legal &#13;
protection for pyramid scheme investors is regulated under Law Number 8 of &#13;
1999 on Consumer Protection in conjunction with Law Number 7 of 2014 on &#13;
Trade; and (2) how the legal remedies available to investors and the liability of &#13;
investment companies for losses suffered by pyramid scheme investors are &#13;
regulated under Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection in conjunction &#13;
with Law Number 7 of 2014 on Trade.The theories applied in this study are the &#13;
theory of legal protection and the theory of legal liability. This research employs a &#13;
normative juridical method through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. &#13;
The data used consist of secondary data, supported by primary data. The results &#13;
of the study indicate that PT Bandung Eco Sinergi Teknologi has not fully &#13;
implemented consumer protection principles, as pyramid scheme promotional &#13;
patterns are still identified and investors’ legal efforts to access out-of-court &#13;
dispute resolution institutions remain weak, indicating the need for strengthening &#13;
legal protection to make it more effective. Furthermore, the implementation of &#13;
such liability has not yet guaranteed investors’ rights to compensation, &#13;
transparency, and legal protection.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">K Law (General)</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA;PROGRAM STUDI ILMU HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>