eprintid: 53516
rev_number: 19
eprint_status: archive
userid: 17487
dir: disk0/00/05/35/16
datestamp: 2025-08-04 08:12:51
lastmod: 2025-08-04 08:12:51
status_changed: 2025-08-04 08:12:51
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: 3336210054@untirta.ac.id
creators_name: ROMADHONI, FITRA
creators_id: 3336210054
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_name: Baehaki, Baehaki
contributors_name: Soelarso, Soelarso
contributors_id: 198705082015041001
contributors_id: 198010012008121004
corp_creators: UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA
corp_creators: FAKULTAS TEKNIK
corp_creators: JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL
title: PERBANDINGAN PERANCANGAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG SISTEM GANDA MENGGUNAKAN ETABS DAN TEKLA STRUCTURAL DESIGNER
ispublished: pub
subjects: TA
subjects: TH
divisions: Sipil
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Dual System, ETABS, Tekla Structural Designer
abstract: Indonesia is a country with high tectonic activity, making it prone to earthquake disasters. Structures with dual systems are an effective choice because they provide good strength against seismic loads. The use of structural design software is important to facilitate and minimize the risk of calculation errors. ETABS and Tekla Structural Designer (TSD) are software programs that can be used to assist in these structural calculations. This study discusses the comparison of dual system design using ETABS and TSD, aiming to identify differences in base shear results, story displacement, and the design of structural elements in terms of the design capacity ratios of slab, beam, column, joint, and shear wall elements. The structure is modeled as a 10-story office building located in Yogyakarta with soft soil conditions. The design is based on SNI 1726:2019, SNI 2847:2019, and SNI 1727:2020. The results show that ETABS has a greater base shear in the X direction (difference of 44.830 kN (1.27%)), while TSD is greater in the Y direction (difference of 4.689 kN (0.81%)). Total story displacement from TSD is greater in the X direction (difference of 1.157 mm (1.65%)), while ETABS is greater in the Y direction (difference of 0.314 mm (0.53%)). In the same review, namely the 1st floor and the largest internal force, ETABS and TSD produced reinforcement ratios respectively as follows: slab flexural 0.5978 and 0.2995, beam flexural 0.8007 and 0.7740, beam shear 0.7680 and 0.7918, beam torsion 0.2232 and 0.3743, column flexural 0.3803 and 0.3352, column shear 0.3334 and 0.3334, joint shear 0.0941 and 0.0964, wall flexural 0.3138 and 0.3400, and wall shear 0.5758 and 0.5616. ETABS tends to have higher ratios in longitudinal reinforcement of slab, beam, and column, as well as transversal wall ratios, while TSD has higher ratios in beam shear, beam torsion, joint shear, and wall longitudinal reinforcement.
date: 2025-06-30
date_type: published
pages: 452
institution: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
department: TEKNIK SIPIL
thesis_type: sarjana
thesis_name: sarjana
referencetext: Asroni, A. (2010). Kolom Fondasi dan Balok T Beton Bertulang (Edisi Pert). Graha Ilmu.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019a). Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan. In SNI 2847-2019. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019b). Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. In SNI 1726-2019. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2020). Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain. In SNI 1727-2020. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Calvin, B., & Johan, J. (2020). Analisis Risiko Dan Pencegahannya Pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Bertingkat Tinggi Dari Sisi Kontraktor. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 4(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v4i1.6719
CSI, C. and S. (2025). Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems (ETABS). CSI America. https://web.wiki.csiamerica.com/wiki/spaces/etabs/overview
Darmansyah, M., & Chairani, E. (2022). Analisa Struktur Balok Beton Pada Pembangunan Rumah Tempat Usaha 6 Lantai Di Jalan Perniagaan N0.55 Medan. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 1(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.30743/jtsip.v1i1.5773
Effendi, F., Chandra, Y., & Akbar, S. J. (2017). Waktu Getar Alami Fundamental. Teras Jurnal, 7(2), 274–283.
Gaidhane, D. P., Ambhore, B. N., & Takarkhede, M. (2024). A Review on Comparison Between Tekla Structural Designer And ETABS Softwares With Respect to Design and Analysis of Residential Building. 12, 695–696.
Hamidi, A. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Nilai Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) Terhadap Story Shear Bangunan Bertingkat. Jurnal Ilmiah Poli Rekayasa, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.30630/jipr.13.2.108
Hendra, H., Zulkarnaen, L. V., Rosanti, I., & Ariyansyah, R. (2021). Analisis Struktur Gedung Tahan Gempa Dengan Metode Sistem Ganda (Dual System). Construction and Material Journal, 3(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i3.4205
Imelda, A., Farihin, M. Z., Sholihah, N. C., & Sari, D. P. (2024). Dinamika Pergerakan Lempeng Tektonik Menggunakan Analisis Literatur Tentang Teori Dan Dampaknya. BIOCHEPHY: Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.52562/biochephy.v4i1.1088
Imran, I., & Hendrik, F. (2016). Perencanaan Lanjut Struktur Beton Bertulang (E. Warsidi (ed.); Cetakan II). ITB Press.
Inayah, J., Fanani, A., & Utami, W. D. (2024). Klasterisasi Data Kejadian Gempa Bumi di Indonesia Menggunakan Metode K-Medoids. Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi (JustIN), 12(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v12i2.73594
Irsyada, F. F., & Suprapto, S. (2025). Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Terhadap Simpangan Antar Lantai Akibat Beban Gempa. 3(27).
Jing Xian, W., & Soffi Md Noh, M. (2022). Comparative Study in the Design of a Reinforced Concrete Structure. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering and Built Environment, 3(1), 1169–1177. http://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/rtcebe
Kusuma, Y. N., Purwanto, ), & Mahendra, W. (2017). Studi Bentuk Dan Layout Dinding Geser (Shear Wall) Terhadap Perilaku Struktur Gedung Bertingkat. Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 1(1), 1–14.
Lesmana, Y. (2020a). Handbook Desain Struktur Beton Bertulang Berdasarkan SNI 2847-2019 (Edisi Pert). CV. Nas Media Pustaka.
Lesmana, Y. (2020b). Handbook Prosedur Analisa Beban Gempa Berdasarkan SNI 1726-2019 (Edisi Pert). CV. Nas Media Pustaka.
Masrura, D., & Abdullah, A. (2020). Analisa Perilaku Sambungan Balok-Kolom Sesuai PBI 1971 Terhadap Beban Siklik. Teras Jurnal : Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 10(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.29103/tj.v10i2.340
Nagar, A., & Singh, R. (2021). Stability Analysis of High Rise Buildings by altering the Beam Members. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(11), 1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39008
Nursani, R., & Noor, D. E. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Penambahan Dinding Geser terhadap Perilaku Struktur Gedung Sistem Ganda. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 8(02), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.29244/jsil.8.02.105-114
Pamungkas, A. (2023). Contoh Laporan Perencanaan Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK) Sesuai SNI-1727 Tahun 2020, SNI 1726 Tahun 2019, SNI 2847 Tahun 2019 (Edisi Keti). CV Budi Utama.
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1974). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons.
Pratomo, R. B., & Hudori, M. (2021). Analisis Perhitungan Struktur Pelat Lantai Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Solnet. Conference on Business, Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1), 765–770.
Rusliyana, A. I., & Kamaludin, K. (2024). ANALISIS KINERJA STRUKTUR GEDUNG DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SAP2000 DAN TEKLA. Teknik Sipil, 27–32.
Sahin, F., & Arsali, E. (2024). Effect of Vertical Elastic Design Spectral Obtained According to Different Soil Classes on Beam Behavior and Comparison of Vertical Component of K.Maras Earthquake with Beam Effect. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 8(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.1324111
Samsunan, S. (2016). Evaluasi Kerusakan Akibat Gempa Pada Bangunan Gedung Bank Aceh Cabang Sigli. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Teknologi Konstruksi, 2(2), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.35308/jts-utu.v2i2.377
Sansujaya, E., Pah, J. J. S., & Udiana, I. M. (2021). Studi Kefektifan Dinding Geser pada Bangunan Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Mengurangi Simpangan Struktur. JURNAL FORUM TEKNIK SIPIL (J-ForTekS), 1(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.35508/forteks.v1i1.4073
Santur, M. F., Pah, J. J. S., & Hangge, E. E. (n.d.). Hubungan Antara Tinggi Pusat Massa Vertikal Bangunan Tingkat Tinggi Terhadap Simpangan Antar Lantai Akibat Beban Gempa Relationship Between Height of Vertical Center of Mass of High-Rise Buildings Against Drift Between Floor Due To Earthquake Load. Jurnal Teknologi, 16(1), 2022.
Saragi, T. E., & Nefa, K. Z. (2022). Analisa Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Struktur Pelat Lantai Metode Konvensional, Boundeck Dan Precast Full Slab Ditinjau Dari Segi Waktu Dan Biaya Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung GBKP Tanah Merah Binjai. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 1(2), 38–52.
Sary, R. K., Jaya, M. A., & Rizal, R. (n.d.). Harmoni Fungsi dan Estetika : Studi Tentang Pengaruh Kolom Utama dan Kolom Praktis Terhadap Desain Bangunan Gedung. Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang.
Setiawan, A. (2016). Perancangan Struktur Beton Bertulang Berdasarkan SNI 2847 Tahun 2013 (L. Simarmata (ed.)). Erlangga.
Sohail, M. A. S., & Joshi, S. P. (2021). Story Stability of a Structure- A Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1197(1), 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1197/1/012074
Stella, C. M., Lestyowati, Y., & Elvira. (2024). Perancangan gedung apartemen beton bertulang 10 lantai dengan sistem ganda di medan 1). JeLAST : Jurnal Teknik Kelautan , PWK , Sipil, Dan Tambang, 11(1), 1–10.
Syafitri, Y., Bahtiar, B., & Didik, L. A. (2020). Analisis Pergeseran Lempeng Bumi Yang Meningkatkan Potensi Terjadinya Gempa Bumi Di Pulau Lombok. Konstan - Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v4i2.43
Syah, M. A., Ardhyan, M. Z., Fajri, H., Purwandito, M., & Irwansyah, I. (2023). Perbandingan Analisis Struktur Gedung Laboratorium PGSD Universitas Samudra Metode Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus Menggunakan ETABS dan BIM Tekla Struktural Designer. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil, 20(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.30630/jirs.v20i2.1048
Tampubolon, S. (2021). Analisis Kekuatan Geser Pada Hubungan Balok-Kolom Interior Beton Bertulang. Journal of Civil Engineering Building and Transportation, 5(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.31289/jcebt.v5i1.3731
Tavio, T., & Kusuma, B. (2009). Desain Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen dan Dinding Struktur Beton Bertulang Tahan Gempa (Edisi Pert). ITS Press.
Trimble, T. (2025). Tekla Strcutural Designer. Trimble. https://www.tekla.com/id/produk/tekla-structural-designer
Zahrotunnabil, B., Wahidin, W., & Asukumajaya, B. (2025). Analisis Perilakuk Struktur Gedung Terhadap Variasi Penempatan Dinding Geser Menggunakan Metode Respons Spektrum (pp. 261–265).
citation:   ROMADHONI, FITRA  (2025) PERBANDINGAN PERANCANGAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG SISTEM GANDA MENGGUNAKAN ETABS DAN TEKLA STRUCTURAL DESIGNER.  S1 thesis, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.   
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/1/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_Fulltext.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/2/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_01.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/3/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_02.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/4/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_03.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/5/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_04.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/6/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_05.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/7/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_06.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/8/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_Ref.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/9/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_Lamp.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53516/19/Fitra%20Romadhoni_3336210054_CP.pdf