%I Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
%D 2025
%K ETABS
TEKLA STRUCTURAL DESIGNER
Perencanaan Struktur
%T PERBANDINGAN PERANCANGAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG SRPMK MENGGUNAKAN ETABS DAN TEKLA STRUCTURAL DESIGNER
%O Seiring perkembangan teknologi dalam bidang teknik sipil, khususnya dalam  perancangan struktur, berbagai perangkat lunak telah dikembangkan untuk  membantu dalam perencanaan struktur. Dua di antaranya adalah ETABS (Extended  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems) dan TSD (Tekla Structural  Designer). Perlu diketahui hasil perancangan struktur gedung pada kedua perangkat  lunak, khususnya pada sistem SRPMK untuk mengetahui sejauh mana perbedaan  hasil perancangan struktur yang dihasilkan dari kedua perangkat lunak tersebut.
%A Rizki Ardiyansah
%X With the advancement of technology in the field of civil engineering, particularly in structural design, various software programs have been developed to assist in structural planning. Two of these are ETABS (Extended Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems) and TSD (Tekla Structural Designer). This study compares both software programs in terms of seismic forces, displacements, and reinforcement detailing produced by each.
The objective of this study is to identify the differences in seismic force values, displacements, and reinforcement detailing produced by the two software programs. The research is conducted on a hypothetical building with a Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) system, designed as a 10-story office building with a floor-to-floor height of 4 meters, a length of 30 meters, and a width of 18 meters. The structural design is based on SNI 1726:2019, SNI 1727:2020, SNI 2847:2019, ACI 318-14, and ASCE 7-16. The calculations are supported by Microsoft Excel, ETABS, and TSD.
The results show that TSD generates higher seismic forces than ETABS, with a maximum difference of 680.374 kg on the 10th floor. The inter-story drifts from both software are identical. The flexural reinforcement ratio of slabs, shear reinforcement of beams, and flexural reinforcement of columns are greater in TSD, while the flexural reinforcement ratio of beams is higher in ETABS. The shear reinforcement ratio of columns and the reinforcement of beam-column joints yielded the same results in both software. In structural design, it is recommended to carefully consider the design standards being applied, as they significantly influence the resulting values.
%L eprintuntirta53472