relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/
title: RATIO DECIDENDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN TERSANGKA PUTUSAN  PRAPERADILAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SERANG  (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NO 11/PID.PRA/2023/PN.SRG)
creator: Yunita, Nila
subject: K Law (General)
description: The determination of a suspect is a crucial step in the investigation of a criminal  offense. However, in practice, legal debates often arise regarding the legitimacy  of suspect designation, particularly when challenged through the pretrial  mechanism. This research employs a normative juridical method, or doctrinal  legal research, which relies on secondary data sources using the statute approach  and case approach. The research findings indicate that a lawful determination of  a suspect must be based on at least two preliminary pieces of evidence and must  follow procedures regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code  (KUHAP) and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. In case Number  11/PID.PRA/2023/PN.SRG, the Pretrial Judge at the Serang District Court went  beyond procedural review and entered into the substance of the case. According  to prevailing legal norms, judges in pretrial hearings should only examine formal  legality or procedural validity, not determine the guilt or innocence of the suspect.  This is in contrast to other pretrial decisions, such as Number  1/PID.PRA/2024/PN.PDL and Number 20/PID.PRA/2023/PN.TNG, where the  petitions were denied on the basis that the arrest procedures were valid and  supported by sufficient preliminary evidence. This inconsistency in pretrial  rulings reflects differing interpretations of what constitutes "sufficient preliminary  evidence," resulting in legal uncertainty. Therefore, there is a need for a clearer  and more uniform legal construction in pretrial proceedings to ensure this  mechanism effectively protects citizens’ rights and upholds the principle of legal  certainty
date: 2025
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/1/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_FULL%20TEXT.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/2/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_01.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/3/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_02.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/4/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_03.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/5/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_04.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/6/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_05.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53450/7/NILA%20YUNITA_7773230033_REFF.pdf
identifier:   Yunita, Nila  (2025) RATIO DECIDENDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN TERSANGKA PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SERANG (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NO 11/PID.PRA/2023/PN.SRG).  Master thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.