eprintid: 53340
rev_number: 19
eprint_status: archive
userid: 13011
dir: disk0/00/05/33/40
datestamp: 2025-08-01 05:50:45
lastmod: 2025-08-01 05:50:45
status_changed: 2025-08-01 05:50:45
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: 3336200066@untirta.ac.id
creators_name: Maharani, Mutiara
creators_id: 3336200066
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS
contributors_name: Fathonah, Woelandari
contributors_name: Kusuma, Rama Indera
contributors_id: 199012292019032021
contributors_id: 198108222006041001
corp_creators: UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA
corp_creators: FAKULTAS TEKNIK
corp_creators: JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL
title: STUDI PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG DAN PENURUNAN MINI PILE BERDASARKAN METODE ANALITIK DAN NUMERIK SERTA VERIFIKASI LAPANGAN MENGGUNAKAN PDA TEST
ispublished: pub
subjects: TA
subjects: TH
divisions: Sipil
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Daya Dukung, Penurunan, Plaxis 2D, CPT, Uji PDA
abstract: This study compares the bearing capacity and settlement of mini piles between analytical and numerical methods, validated by PDA (Pile Driving Analyzer) tests and CAPWAP (Case Pile Wave Analysis Program) analysis, which aims to identify the method that most closely approximates in-situ measurements. Three piles were examined, PC1A7-NO61, PC1B1-NO43, and PC1C5-NO17, all with uniform dimensions of  30 x 30 centimeters and a total pile length of 9 meters. Overall results indicate that, for the single pile bearing capacity, the Schmertmann and Nottingham methods yielded the closest bearing capacity estimates, with deviations of 21,179%, -8,827% and 11,478%  from PDA test results and 14,865%, -13,726% and -11,737% from CAPWAP analysis results. For the single pile settlement, the Meyerhof empirical method is most closely matched CAPWAP analysis results, with differences for each pile of 7,537 mm, 5,881 mm dan 7,135 mm. These methods were selected because of their compliance with design criteria and had lower deviations, and did not underestimate the in-situ measurements.
Variations in bearing capacity estimates may occur due to differences in the reduction factor values used. Meanwhile, differences in settlement calculation results are caused by the complexity of the analysis. The Meyerhof method is an empirical formula with simple assumptions that relies on limited parameters. On the other hand, the finite element method models soil conditions in greater detail. However, the lack of soil parameter data and the use of correlation values may reduce the accuracy of the actual soil parameters in the field. These differences highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate method and validating it through field tests such as the PDA test to ensure the reliability of the design.
date: 2025-06-30
date_type: published
pages: 264
institution: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
department: Teknik Sipil
thesis_type: sarjana
thesis_name: sarjana
referencetext: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. (2005). ASTM D3441-98 Standard Test Method for Mechanical Cone Penetration Tests of Soil.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. (2017). ASTM D4945-12 Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic Testing of Deep Foundations. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4945-12.2
Anggoro, W. D., Bachtiar, V., & Aprianto. (n.d.). Analisa Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Fondasi Tiang Pancang Menggunakan Data Uji Lapangan dan Program Plaxis v.8.6 Pada Proyek Gedung Kuliah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Katolik Negeri Pontianak. 1–9.
Apriyono, A., Yanto, Santoso, P. B., & Sumiyanto. (2018). Soil Classification Based on Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Data in Western Central Java. AIP Conference Proceedings, 020004(April 2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5028062
Bachtiar, V., & Yusuf, M. (2012). Evaluasi Daya Dukung Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Dan Pile Driven Analyzer (PDA) Pada Tanah Lunak Di Kota Pontianak. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.26418/jtsft.v12i1.17151
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2008). SNI 2827:2008 Cara Uji Penetrasi Lapangan dengan Alat Sondir.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2017a). SNI 8459:2017 Metode Uji Fondasi Dalam dengan High-Strain Dynamic Pile (HSDP).
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2017b). SNI 8460:2017 Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 1726:2019 Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). SNI 1727:2020 Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain.
Bowles, J. E. (1979). Physical and Geotechnical Properties of Soils (B. J. Clark, F. J. Cerra, & M. Eichberg (ed.); Internatio). McGraw-Hill.
Bowles, J. E. (1997). Foundation Analysis and Design (Fifth). McGraw-Hill.
Bowles, J. E. (2005). Analisis Dan Desain Pondasi (Ke empat). Erlangga.
Das, B. M. (1995a). Mekanika Tanah Jilid 1 (Prinsip-prinsip Rekayasa Geoteknis). In Erlangga. Erlangga.
Das, B. M. (1995b). Mekanika Tanah Jilid 2 (Prinsip-prinsip Rekayasa Geoteknis). Erlangga.
Das, B. M. (2011). Principles of Foundation Engineering (Ke Tujuh). http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari
Das, B. M. (2017). Shallow Foundations - Bearing Capacity and Settlement (Ketiga). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. http://taylorandfrancis.com
Fahmi, M. (2023). Analisis Perhitungan Daya Dukung Tanah Menggunakan Metode Van Der Ween dan Meyerhof. Universitas Sulawesi Barat.
Faruha, A., & Ridwan, M. (2018). Analisa Perhitungan Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Dibandingkan dengan Daya Dukung Hydraulic Jacking System dan Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) Test pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Kediri. 2(2), 1–10. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/rekayasa-teknik-sipil/article/view/24726
Gunadarma. (2009). Rekayasa Fundasi II - Fundasi Dangkal dan Fundasi Dalam. In Universsitas Gunadarma.
Hakam, A. (2008). Rekayasa Pondasi Untuk Mahasiswa Dan Praktisi (H. P. Andriani (ed.); Nomor April 2008). CV. Bintang Grafika.
Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2011a). Analisis dan Perancangan Fondasi Bagian 1 (Kedua). Gajah Mada University Press.
Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2011b). Analisis dan Perancangan Fondasi II (Keda). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hidayat, Z. N., Aschuri, I., & Pratiwi, D. S. (2022). Analisis Daya Dukung Tiang Pancang pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung BNI KCP Gunung Sahari Jakarta. FTSP Series, 242–247.
Karimpour-Fard, M., & Eslami, A. (2013). Estimation of vertical bearing capacity of piles using the results CPT and SPT tests. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Site Characterization 4, ISC-4, 2(September 2012), 1055–1062.
Khoirunisaa, T., Setiawan, B., & Purwana, Y. M. (2023). Comparative Study of Axial Bearing Capacity for Pile Foundation Based On Empirical, Numerical Method and Pile Driving Analyzer Test. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 19(4), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2023-19-4-196-207
Laksono, A. D., Fatmawati, L. E., & Widhiarto, H. (2023). Perencanaan Ulang Pondasi Tiang Pancang Mini Pile (Square Pile) Sebagai Alternatif Perkuatan Pondasi Pada Proyek Pembangunan SMPN 9 Kota Kediri. De’Teksi: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 8(2), 8–19.
Liu, C., & Evett, J. B. (1992). Soil and Foundations (Third). Prentice Hall.
Look, B. G. (2007). Handbook of Geotechnical Investigation and Design Tables. Taylor & Francis. www.balkema.nl, www.taylorandfrancis.co.uk
Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K., & Powell, J. J. M. (1997). Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Blackie Academic & Professional. https://www.geotashfeen.tech/
Mahmudi, A. (2023). Analisis Hasil Pengujian Sondir untuk Mengetahui Kapasitas Dukung dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Pancang dan Bore Pile terhadap Variasi Dimensi di Lokasi Ubhara Surabaya. Jurnal Inter Tech, 1(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.54732/i.v1i1.1023
Mardianti, I. Y., Nuklirullah, M., & Dwina, D. O. (2022). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Data Sondir (Studi Kasus : Pembangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit Pendidikan Universitas Jambi). Menara: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/jmenara.v17i2.27079
Mina, E., Kusuma, R. I., & Mahardika, E. P. (2019). Analisis Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Berdasarkan Data Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Dan Cone Penetration Test (CPT) (Studi Kasus : East Cross Taxiway Bandara Internasional Soekarno – Hatta). Jurnal Fondasi, 8(2), 130–141.
Mulya, E. R., & Darwis, F. (2020). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Tower BTS Berdasarkan Uji Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 6(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3694726
Napitupulu, K., & Sari, K. I. (2023). Analisis Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Pondasi Bored Pile Berdasarkan Data Pengujian CPT dengan Software Plaxis Pada Pembangunan Pasar Baru Penyabungan Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. 2(2), 155–162. https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/JTSIP
Nugraha, A. F. (2023). Perbandingan Daya Dukung Tanah Berdasarkan Hasil CPT, SPT dan Laboratorium pada Rencana Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Terminal Pelabuhan Donggala, Sulawesii Tengah. Universitas Sangga Buana (USB - YPKP Bandung.
Pasaribu, B., Tanjung, D., & Akbar, F. H. (2022). Analisis Kapasitas Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Pada Pembangunan Gedung Fortunate Citra Grand City Palembang dengan Menggunakan Metode Analitis. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 1(2), 203–209. https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/JTSIP
Poulos, H. G. (2017). Tall Building Foundation Design. Taylor & Francis. http://www.crcpress.com
Pratama, C. D., & Ardianto, D. (2022). Analisa Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Seketika Fondasi Mini Pile pada Gedung Fraksi DPRD Kudus. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Pratama, Y. (2020). Analisis Kapasitas Dukung Statis Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Data Sondir (CPT) Pada Gedung Kuliah Kampus Pelita Indonesia. Universitas Islam Riau.
Putri, M. D. R., & Nurwidyaningrum, D. (2022). Teknik Pondasi Dalam Jalan dan Jembatan (D. Nurwidyaningrum (ed.)).
Rahardjo, P. P. (2008). Uji Sondir - Interpretasi dan Aplikasinya untuk Perancangan Pondasi. Universitas Katolik Parhyangan.
Rahardjo, P. P. (2017). Manual Pondasi Tiang. DFRI Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
Rahmad, M. J. (2021). Analisa Kuat Dukung dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Mini Berdasarkan Data Sondir Pada Gedung Kantor Badan Perthanan Nasional Kota Pekanbaru. Universitas Islam Riau.
Rumbyarso, Y. P. A. (2022). Analisis Daya Dukung Kawasan Pendidikan STT Wastu Kencana (Studi Kasus Gedung STT Wastu Kencana). Plano Krisna, 18(1), 87–98.
Sakleshpur, V. A., Prezzi, M., & Salgado, R. (2024). CPT-based design of pile foundations in sand and clay: perspectives. E3S Web of Conferences, 544(September). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454417002
Schmertmann, J. H. (1970). Static Cone to Compute Static Settlement Over Sand. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE, 96(1011–1035).
Schmertmann, J. H. (1978). Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test Performance and Design. National Technical Information Service. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/958
Setiyo, D., Suhendra, & Nuklirullah, M. (2019). Analisa Daya Dukung Tanah untuk Pondasi Tiang Pancang pada Rencana Pembangunan Komplek Pendidikan Islam Al Azhar 57 Jambi. Jurnal Civronlit Unbari, 4(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.33087/civronlit.v4i2.54
Situmorang, H. K., Darmiyanti, L., & Indriasari. (2024). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Data Sondir Pada Proyek Pembangunan Boarding School. Anggapa, 3(November), 19–28. ojs.widyakartika.ac.id/index.php/anggapa
Song, C. R., Kim, S., Bekele, B., Zhang, J., & Silvey, A. (2019). CPT Based Pile Design. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ndor
Standard, I., & Preview, T. S. (2009). ISO 22476-12:2009 International Standard Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Field Testing - Part 12: Mechanical Cone Penetration Test (CPTM). https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/e3bba681-ae4e-405a-8ec0- c7374b224c55/iso-22476-12-2009
Tanah, A. L. M. (2014). Modul Praktikum SI-2122 Mekanika Tanah Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Laboratorium Mekanika Tanah Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Tech, B. I. G. (2022). Modul Penyusunan Stratifikasi Tanah - Advance Geocalculation for Infrastructure Problem.
Tomlinson, M., & Woodward, J. (2008). Pile Design and Construction Practice (Fifth, Vol. 11, Nomor 1). Taylor & Francis. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari
Triastuti, N. S. (2022). Berbagai Macam Pondasi. In L. Darmiyanti (Ed.), Mitra Ilmu. Mitra Ilmu.
Turin, T. A., Arifin, B. M. E., & Tohir, M. (n.d.). Perencanaan Pondasi Tiang Pancang Pada Pembangunan Reservoir dan Tangki WTP Kapasitas 250 Ribu Liter PDAM Kec. Lakulu Kab. Kutai Kartanegara. 1–15.
Wismantaraharjo, M. T., Gandi, S., & Sarie, F. (2020). Analisis Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Tiang Pancang Kelompok Proyek Pembangunan Gedung DPRD Kota Palangka Raya. Jurnal Teknika, 3(2), 198–207.
Y, S. (2023). Analisis Perhitungan Daya Dukung Tanah Menggunakan Metode Terzaghi dan Philipponant. Universitas Sulawesi Barat.
citation:   Maharani, Mutiara  (2025) STUDI PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG DAN PENURUNAN MINI PILE BERDASARKAN METODE ANALITIK DAN NUMERIK SERTA VERIFIKASI LAPANGAN MENGGUNAKAN PDA TEST.  S1 thesis, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.   
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/1/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_Fulltext.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/2/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_01.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/3/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_02.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/4/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_03.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/5/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_04.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/6/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_05.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/7/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_06.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/8/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_Ref.pdf
document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/53340/18/Mutiara%20Maharani_3336200066_Lamp.pdf