relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/
title: PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KERUGIAN MITRA DRIVER   MAXIM AKIBAT ORDERAN FIKTIF ANTAR SESAMA DRIVER DI   KOTA SERANG BERDASARKAN KUHPERDATA DAN UNDANG-  UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG USAHA MIKRO, KECIL,   DAN MENENGAH
creator: Ahsan, Muhamad Haikal
subject: K Law (General)
description: The online transportation business practice carried out by PT Maxim Indonesia is  based on a partnership relationship. Business practices through partnership  relationships in Indonesia are listed in Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro,  Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM Law). However, in the implementation of  the partnership relationship between driver partners and PT Maxim, there are many  obstacles that are detrimental to maxim driver partners, namely the existence of  fictitious orders made by fellow drivers for personal gain. The problem of fictitious  orders among drivers is then rampant in Serang City, maxim driver partners  experience losses in terms of time and material. This study aims to determine and  analyze the legal protection of maxim driver partners who experience losses due to  fictitious orders from fellow drivers and to determine and analyze PT Maxim's  responsibility due to the losses of maxim driver partners who experience fictitious  orders. The research method used is normative juridical method supported by  empirical juridical method and analyzed qualitatively. The result of this research is  the absence of special provisions regarding legal protection of maxim drivers as an  online motorcycle taxi partner, especially in Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning  Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises which causes an imbalance of rights and  obligations in the Maxim License Agreement and results in harm to maxim drivers  because drivers as partners until now are still difficult to get justice and their rights  as a partner due to their status which is not included in the workforce. PT Maxim  in its standard agreement states that it is not responsible for the loss of maxim driver  partners due to fictitious orders. This action is contrary to the principle of  partnership where partners must need, trust, strengthen, and benefit each other.
date: 2025
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/1/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_Fulltext.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/2/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_01.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/3/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_02.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/4/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_03.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/5/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_04.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/6/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_05.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/7/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_Ref.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/48752/8/Muhamad%20Haikal%20Ahsan_1111200256_Lamp.pdf
identifier:   Ahsan, Muhamad Haikal  (2025) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KERUGIAN MITRA DRIVER MAXIM AKIBAT ORDERAN FIKTIF ANTAR SESAMA DRIVER DI KOTA SERANG BERDASARKAN KUHPERDATA DAN UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG USAHA MIKRO, KECIL, DAN MENENGAH.  S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.