relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/
title: PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVESTOR ATAS TIDAK   DILAKSANAKANNYA PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN OLEH   EMITEN ATAU PERUSAHAAN PUBLIK   (Studi Kasus PT Widodo Makmur Perkasa Tbk. Jakarta Timur)
creator: Adityo, Noval
subject: K Law (General)
description: The capital market according to Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital  Market (Capital Market Law) is the party that organizes and provides systems  and/or facilities to match the buy and sell offers of other parties with the aim of  trading securities among them. The advantage of listing shares, among others, is  that the company can easily obtain new sources of funds through the issuance of  shares, bonds, or other securities. On the other hand, the disadvantage is the  requirement for extensive public information disclosure, which means the  company will always be monitored by the public. Therefore, many public  companies have been late in reporting their obligations, which is part of the  transparency principle according to Article 1, paragraph 25 of the PM Law. PT  Widodo Makmur Perkasa Tbk is one of the public companies that violated this  principle of transparency by being late in presenting its interim financial  statements. Additionally, previously, PT Widodo Makmur Perkasa Tbk was also  late in presenting the 2022 annual financial report and late in reporting periodic  financials in April 2023. The sanction imposed by the Indonesia Stock Exchange  as a Self Regulatory Organization (SRO) on PT Widodo Makmur Perkasa Tbk is  in the form of a Written Warning I in accordance with the Decision of the Board of  Directors of PT Bursa Efek Jakarta Number: Kep-307/BEJ/07-2004 concerning  Sanctions. This research uses the theory of legal protection and responsibility,  employing a normative juridical method supported by an empirical juridical  method and analyzed qualitatively. The result of this research is that legal  protection for investors is considered to lack elements of justice because the  sanctions imposed are often merely written warnings, even after multiple  violations of the principle of transparency. The regulations used by the Indonesia  Stock Exchange to impose sanctions on violators of the principle of transparency  have been in place for too long, leading many public companies to neglect the  obligation to adhere to the principle of transparency. Then, the responsibility here  depends on the assessment of the capital market supporting profession, but the  primary responsibility lies with the issuer, because the issuer receives investor  funds after the initial public offering (IPO) or going public.
date: 2024
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/1/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_FULL%20TEXT.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/2/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_01.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/3/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_02.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/4/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_03.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/5/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_04.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/6/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_05.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/7/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_REFF.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/47511/8/NOVAL%20ADITYO_1111200135_LAMP.pdf
identifier:   Adityo, Noval  (2024) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVESTOR ATAS TIDAK DILAKSANAKANNYA PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN OLEH EMITEN ATAU PERUSAHAAN PUBLIK (Studi Kasus PT Widodo Makmur Perkasa Tbk. Jakarta Timur).  S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.