relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/
title: PERAN NEGARA DALAM PENYAMPAIAN “ORAL STATEMENT” PADA MEKANISME ADVISORY OPINION DI INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
creator: Malida Hany, Elbirra
subject: K Law (General)
description: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial body of the United Nations. The ICJ has jurisdiction to settle disputes and issue advisory opinions. One ongoing disputes that remains unresolved is the Israel-Palestine conflict, which led the General Assembly and countries to request an advisory opinion regarding the conflict. According to Article 65 of the ICJ Statute, only international organizations can request an advisory opinion. This research addresses two problems, 1) How is the mechanism for deliveringm an oral statements by a country during the advisory opinion process at the ICJ? and 2) What effectiveness is the role of Indonesia in delivering oral statements at the ICJ regarding the advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem? The objective of this research is to understand the mechanism of oral statements during the advisory opinion process and to analyze Indonesia's role in that process. The researcher employs the theory of national interest and legal effectiveness, using a juridical normative method to address the identified issues. The research findings indicate that the mechanism for oral statements in advisory opinions is regulated in Articles 65-68 ICJ Statute and Articles 104 and 105(2) Rules of Court. The national interests of countries delivering oral statements are based on core, secondary, and general national interests. Indonesia plays a role in this process by formulating, compiling, and delivering oral statements. The effectiveness of Indonesia's oral statements can be assessed from legal factors, supporting advice, and cultural influences, which are relatively effective. The researcher recommends that all UN member states, the Security Council, and Israel apply the advisory opinion that has been established.
date: 2025
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/1/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_FULLTEXT.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/2/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_01.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/3/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_02.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/4/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_03.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/5/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_04.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/6/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_05.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/7/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_Ref.pdf
format: text
language: en
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/46586/8/ELBIRRA%20MALIDA%20HANY_1111200079_Lampiran.pdf
identifier:   Malida Hany, Elbirra  (2025) PERAN NEGARA DALAM PENYAMPAIAN “ORAL STATEMENT” PADA MEKANISME ADVISORY OPINION DI INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE.  S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.