relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/
title: PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUKAAN  LAHAN DENGAN CARA PEMBAKARAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN  TERJADINYA KEBAKARAN HUTAN  (Studi Putusan No 251/Pid B/LH/2019/PN Stg.)
creator: ARIE EDGINAWAN, MUHAMMAD
subject: K Law (General)
description: Forest and land fires are serious issues that continue to occur annually in  Indonesia. One of the main causes is land clearing through burning, whether  intentional or due to negligence, which has negative impacts on the environment,  public health, and societal well-being. Despite being regulated under Law No. 32  of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH), the  enforcement of laws against land burning perpetrators still faces numerous  challenges. The identified research problems are: How is the enforcement of  criminal law against perpetrators of land clearing through burning that causes  forest fires (Case Study of Decision No. 251/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN Stg)? and What  are the judges' considerations in ruling on such land clearing cases? The theories  used are the Theory of Law Enforcement and the Theory of Judicial  Consideration. This study employs a normative juridical method with data  analyzed using a qualitative approach. The data sources consist of primary,  secondary, and tertiary legal materials, collected through literature review  techniques.The results show that, in Decision No. 251/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN Stg, the  defendant carried out land clearing by burning, which led to a fire spreading to  54 hectares. However, the judge acquitted the defendant without adequately  considering the environmental impact and the provisions of Article 69 paragraph  (1) letter h of the UUPPLH, which limits land burning under local wisdom  principles. The judges' considerations were deemed suboptimal as they failed to  comprehensively include juridical, sociological, and philosophical aspects, thus  failing to reflect legal certainty, justice, and legal benefits.In conclusion, the  judges' reasoning in this decision is considered flawed as it did not fully consider  the legal facts and the impact of the defendant's actions. This renders the  enforcement of laws on land burning ineffective and opens the door for similar  acts in the future. It is recommended that judges consider juridical, sociological,  and philosophical aspects in their decisions to achieve justice, legal certainty, and  public benefit.
date: 2025
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/1/01.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%20Full%20Text.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/3/03.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%2001.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/4/04.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%2002.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/5/05.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%2003.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/6/06.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%2004.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/7/07.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%2005.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/8/08.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%20Ref.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/45778/9/09.%20Muhammad%20Arie%20Edginawan%20_%201111190370%20_%20Lamp.pdf
identifier:   ARIE EDGINAWAN, MUHAMMAD  (2025) PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUKAAN LAHAN DENGAN CARA PEMBAKARAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN TERJADINYA KEBAKARAN HUTAN (Studi Putusan No 251/Pid B/LH/2019/PN Stg.).  S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.