relation: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/
title: Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap pembatalan surat wasiat dalam pengadilan yang memuat keterangan tidak benar dikaitkan dengan kekuatan pembuktian sebagai akta otentik dalam hukum acara perdata berdasarkan kitab Undang-Undang Perdata
creator: Febriyani, Fanny
subject: K Law (General)
description: In the case of the Surabaya District Court Decision with case registration number: 577/PDT.G/2020/PN SBY, there is a problem with the application of the law where there is a decision made by the defendant Notary and the cancellation of the deed made by the Notary in the authentic notarial deed Tri Avianti Merpatiningsih Number 03/2006. This identified the problem in this case, Slokowati Hadiwidjojo (Plaintiff) sued Sri Rahayu Sutikno (Defendant) and several co-defendants regarding the inheritance status of Singgih Hadiwidjojo, who was mentioned as a biological child in the will which was the basis for the Certificate of Inheritance Rights. However, Singgih Hadiwidjojo was actually an adopted child who was adopted without a court decision. Based on the background description, the identification of the problems in this writing is: 1) What is the strength of the evidence regarding will number 3 of 2006 which contains incorrect information in terms of book IV Article 1864 of the Civil Code?  2) What are the legal consequences of will number 3 of 2006 which contains incorrect inheritance information based on the Civil Code in case: 577/PDT.G/2020/PN SBY? The method that will be used in this legal research is the Normative Juridical method with a legal principles research approach carried out on legal rules with data collection techniques in this research namely Decision Study, Library Research Study (library research) and in-depth interviews with sources who are competent and related to research problems. In research on the decision of the Surabaya District Court in Case number : 577/PDT.G/2020/PN SBY, conclusions from the research results, namely: 1) The strength of the evidence for authentic deeds which contain false information viewed from the perspective of Civil Procedure Law, namely based on the provisions of Article 1868 of the Code. The Civil Code defines an authentic deed as a deed which is in the form determined by law and an authentic deed is strong evidence and if a dispute occurs in court, unless its untruth can be proven; 2) The legal consequences of the will which is the basis for the inheritance certificate are incorrect, namely the cancellation of the deed made
date: 2024
type: Thesis
type: PeerReviewed
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/1/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_FULL%20TEXT.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/2/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_01.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/3/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_02.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/4/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_03.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/5/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_04.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/6/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_05.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/7/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_REFF.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/44850/8/FANNY%20FEBRIYANI_1111170340_LAMP.pdf
identifier:   Febriyani, Fanny  (2024) Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap pembatalan surat wasiat dalam pengadilan yang memuat keterangan tidak benar dikaitkan dengan kekuatan pembuktian sebagai akta otentik dalam hukum acara perdata berdasarkan kitab Undang-Undang Perdata.  S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.