eprintid: 43982 rev_number: 20 eprint_status: archive userid: 18245 dir: disk0/00/04/39/82 datestamp: 2024-12-30 15:23:11 lastmod: 2024-12-30 15:23:11 status_changed: 2024-12-30 15:23:11 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Destiana Safitri, Sifa creators_id: 2223200105 contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_type: http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/THS contributors_name: Baihaqi, Akhmad contributors_name: Fargianti, Yusti contributors_id: 198404212009021004 contributors_id: 198607172023212004 corp_creators: Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa corp_creators: Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan corp_creators: Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris title: THE PERCEPTIONS OF EFL STUDENTS IN USING QUILLBOT AS A TOOL FOR PARAPHRASING ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING ispublished: pub subjects: LB subjects: LB2300 divisions: FKIP divisions: Inggris full_text_status: restricted keywords: academic writing, EFL students’, paraphrasing, perception, quillbot. note: This study aims to investigate students' perceptions and identify obstacles in using QuillBot as a paraphrasing tool to assist academic writing. Students' perceptions were analyzed through physical and psychological dimensions, while the obstacles encountered included technical aspects and the adverse effects of using QuillBot. The method used was a qualitative descriptive case study, with data collected through observation, a closed questionnaire on a five-level Likert scale, and indepth interviews. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions covering perceptions and obstacles. The responses were then analyzed descriptively using frequency, percentage, and average scores. The findings showed that students generally had a positive perception of QuillBot. About 96.6% of students found the tool easy to use, and 93.3% felt it increased their confidence and comfort in writing. However, obstacles remain, as 86.6% of respondents experienced access limitations, mainly due to the limited features of the free version. In addition, 63.3% of students reported issues such as over-reliance on the tool, leading to laziness in manually paraphrasing. In conclusion, although QuillBot significantly improves the efficiency of academic writing for EFL students, users should supplement its use with manual revision to ensure accuracy and maintain academic integrity. abstract: This study aims to investigate students' perceptions and identify obstacles in using QuillBot as a paraphrasing tool to assist academic writing. Students' perceptions were analyzed through physical and psychological dimensions, while the obstacles encountered included technical aspects and the adverse effects of using QuillBot. The method used was a qualitative descriptive case study, with data collected through observation, a closed questionnaire on a five-level Likert scale, and indepth interviews. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions covering perceptions and obstacles. The responses were then analyzed descriptively using frequency, percentage, and average scores. The findings showed that students generally had a positive perception of QuillBot. About 96.6% of students found the tool easy to use, and 93.3% felt it increased their confidence and comfort in writing. However, obstacles remain, as 86.6% of respondents experienced access limitations, mainly due to the limited features of the free version. In addition, 63.3% of students reported issues such as over-reliance on the tool, leading to laziness in manually paraphrasing. In conclusion, although QuillBot significantly improves the efficiency of academic writing for EFL students, users should supplement its use with manual revision to ensure accuracy and maintain academic integrity. date: 2024 date_type: published pages: 118 institution: Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa department: Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan thesis_type: sarjana thesis_name: sarjana citation: Destiana Safitri, Sifa (2024) THE PERCEPTIONS OF EFL STUDENTS IN USING QUILLBOT AS A TOOL FOR PARAPHRASING ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING. S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/2/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_CP.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/4/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_02.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/5/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_03.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/6/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_04.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/7/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_05.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/8/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_REFF.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/9/SIFA%20DESTIANA%20S_2223200105_LAMP.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/10/Sifa%20Destiana%20Safitri_2223200105_FullText.pdf document_url: https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/43982/11/Sifa%20Destiana%20Safitri_2223200105_01.pdf