TEACHING PROCEDURAL TEXT WRITING THROUGH GROUP DISCUSSION AT GRADE XI SMAN 5 KOTA SERANG

NURHIDAYATI, NURHIDAYATI (2018) TEACHING PROCEDURAL TEXT WRITING THROUGH GROUP DISCUSSION AT GRADE XI SMAN 5 KOTA SERANG. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

Text
TEACHING PROCEDURAL TEXT WRITING THROUGH GROUP DISCUSSION AT GRADE XI SMAN 5 KOTA SERANG.pdf
Download (1MB)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the effect of Group Discussion toward sutudents’ Procedural Text Writing improvement at the eleventh grade students of SMAN 5 Kota Serang. The population of this research was all of students of the eleventh grade of SMAN 5 Kota Serang, and the sample used in this research was the students of XI MIA 2 consisted of 31 students, and XI MIA 3 consisted of 30 students. The researcher took all of them as subject of the research. The main of experimental research is to search the information about teaching procedural text writing through group discussion. The result of this research based on the data collected from the students showed that, the t value is 0.24 with the level of significance 5% are 2, 00 and 2, 65 from the d.f .59 t Value is higher then t table 2.00<2.91 >2, 65 So the null hypothesis of the research is rejected, meaning that there is an influence of discussion technique on student reading ability. It showed that discussion technique can be used as one of the alternative way to teach writing. As the result, the pre-test in the control class got the average score is 64.3 while the post-test in the control class with the average score 74.8. Then the pre-test in the experiment class got the average score 64.70 while the post-test in the experiment class with the average score 82. Having analyzed the data of pre-test and post-test by using t-test formula, the result shows that the coefficient is 2.91. It means that there is a significance difference in teaching writing comprehension by using Group Discussion. From the result of calculation, it is obtained the value of the t observation (to) is 2.35 the degree of freedom (df ) is 38. The researcher used the degree of significance of 5% and 1%. In the table significance, it can be seen that on the df 38 and on degree of significance are 2.00 and 2.65. if the to compared with each value of degrees of significance, the result is 2.00 < 2.91>2.65. where to score obtained from the result of calculating, the alternative hypothesis (Ha ) is accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. All of those findings suggest that group discussion effective in improving students’ procedural text writing ability.

Item Type:

Thesis (S1)

Contributors: