Millatina, Hanifa (2025) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN HAK WARIS ANAK HASIL PERKAWINAN SIRI BERDASARKAN KUH PERDATA DAN KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok Nomor: 1186/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Dpk). S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_11111190189_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (430kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (320kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (273kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (154kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (295kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Millatina Hanifa_1111190189_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (630kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Kedudukan ahli waris anak hasil perkawinan siri, menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam tidak dijelaskan secara rinci dan menurut KUH Perdata anak hasil perkawinan siri mendapatkan warisan asalkan mendapat pengakuan, namun menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VII/2010 anak hasil perkawinan siri mendapatkan hak waris meskipun tidak ada pengakuan dengan syarat alat bukti berupa ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi dan/atau alat bukti lain menurut hukum ternyata mempunyai hubungan darah sebagai ayahnya. Adapun identifikasi masalah yaitu bagaimana kedudukan hak waris anak hasil perkawinan siri berdasarkan Hukum Perdata dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan perbandingan hak waris anak hasil perkawinan siri antara Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan KUH Perdata dihubungkan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUUVIII/2010 sesuai Putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok Nomor 1186/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Dpk. Kemudian, metode yang digunakan yaitu metode yuridis normatif. Dan kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VII/2010 anak hasil perkawinan siri mendapatkan warisnya sebagaimana hak waris anak kandung dengan melakukan pembuktian atas statusnya sebagai anak kandung. Kemudian menurut Putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok Nomor 1186/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Dpk dalam perkaranya diputuskan bahwasanya anak hasil perkawinan siri tidak mendapatkan hak warisnya sebagaimana seharusnya dicantumkan di dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 yang pada pokoknya menegaskan bahwa anak yang dilahirkan di luar perkawinan perlu ditinjau hubungan keperdataannya dengan ayah melalui pembuktian berbasis perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi dan/atau alat bukti lain menurut hukum, sehingga apabila terbukti memiliki hubungan darah maka harus ditetapkan adanya hubungan keperdataan antara anak dengan keluarga ayah dan ibunya. Hak Waris, Perkawinan.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | The position of the heirs of children from siri marriage, according to the Compilation of Islamic Law is not explained in detail and according to the Civil Code, children from siri marriage get inheritance as long as they get recognition, but according to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, children from siri marriage get inheritance rights even though there is no recognition provided that evidence in the form of science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law turns out to have a blood relationship as the father. The problem identification is how the position of the inheritance rights of children from siri marriage based on Civil Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law, and the comparison of the inheritance rights of children from siri marriage between the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Civil Code in connection with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in accordance with the Depok Religious Court Decision Number 1186/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Dpk. Then, the method used is the normative juridical method. And the conclusion of this research is that according to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, children from siri marriages get their inheritance as the inheritance rights of biological children by proving their status as biological children which essentially affirms that a child born outside of marriage must have his or her civil relationship with the father examined through evidence based on developments in science and technology and/or other legally recognized proof, so that if a biological relationship is established, a civil legal relationship between the child and the father’s and mother’s families must be recognized. Inheritence Rights, Marriage. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Hak Waris, Perkawinan. Inheritence Rights, Marriage. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum | |||||||||
| Depositing User: | Millatina Hanifa | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2026 03:42 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 14 Jan 2026 03:42 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/57157 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
