Saputra, Kelik Caesar (2025) WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI APARTEMEN (STUDI KASUS M’KOSTEL KENCANA LOKA SERANG). S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (11MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (505kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (464kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (475kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (208kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_REFF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (335kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
KELIK CAESAR SAPUTRA_1111210284_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (10MB) |
Abstract
Apartment sale and purchase transactions, in general, use a Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB); in reality, the pre-project selling marketing system often utilizes a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) instrument. However, this practice is prone to issues, as occurred in the case of the Serang apartment, which committed a default in the form of a delayed unit handover to the consumer. This research aims to analyze the compliance of the PPJB's implementation with applicable regulations, as well as the legal consequences and the developer's form of liability. The method used is empirical juridical with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The research findings indicate that although the PPJB is valid according to the requirements of Article 1320 of the Civil Code, its form as a private deed that was only registered (waarmerking) does not comply with the mandate of Government Regulation No. 12 of 2021, which requires an authentic deed, thereby weakening the consumer's legal protection. Furthermore, the default of a delayed handover committed by the developer gives rise to legal consequences for the consumer to demand the cancellation of the agreement, accompanied by comprehensive and measurable compensation, which includes the full refund of all funds paid, damages for the loss of potential profits (lucrum cessans), and default interest, with a significant total projected material loss. The developer's excuse of financial difficulties was proven to be not classifiable as a state of force (force majeure) that could release it from its absolute liability.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Transaksi jual beli apartemen pada umumnya menggunakan AJB, dalam kenyataannya dengan sistem pemasaran pre-project selling seringkali menggunakan instrumen Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB). Namun, praktik ini rentan menimbulkan permasalahan, sebagaimana terjadi pada kasus pembangunan Apartemen Serang oleh yang melakukan wanprestasi berupa keterlambatan penyerahan unit kepada konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesesuaian pelaksanaan PPJB tersebut dengan peraturan yang berlaku, serta akibat hukum dan bentuk pertanggungjawaban developer. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun PPJB sah menurut syarat Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata, bentuknya sebagai akta di bawah tangan yang diwaarmerking tidak sesuai dengan amanat pasal 2 Peraturan Pemerintah No. 12 Tahun 2021 yang menghendaki akta otentik, sehingga melemahkan perlindungan hukum konsumen. Lebih lanjut, wanprestasi keterlambatan serah terima yang dilakukan developer melahirkan akibat hukum bagi konsumen untuk menuntut pembatalan perjanjian yang disertai ganti rugi komprehensif dan terukur, mencakup seluruh dana yang telah dibayarkan, kerugian atas hilangnya potensi keuntungan (lucrum cessans), serta bunga moratoir, dengan total proyeksi kerugian materiil yang signifikan. Dalih kesulitan finansial yang dikemukakan developer terbukti tidak dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai keadaan kahar (force majeure) untuk membebaskannya dari tanggung jawab absolut. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Default, Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB), Apartment. Wanprestasi, Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB), Apartemen. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KD England and Wales |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mr Kelik Caesar Saputra | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 17 Nov 2025 06:47 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2025 06:47 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/56104 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |