Sandi, Rofiq Maulana (2025) TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN TANAH BERDASARKAN SERTIFIKAT ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 68/PDT.G/2024/PN SRG ). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (210kB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (124kB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (123kB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (13kB) |
|
Text
Rofiq Maulana Sandi_1111210303_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (164kB) |
Abstract
The high complexity of land disputes in Indonesia, especially related to overlapping ownership claims originating from the issuance of land certificates. The problems examined in this study are: (1) whether the judge's consideration in Decision Number 68/Pdt.G/2024/PN Srg which stated that the Serang District Court was not authorized to adjudicate was in accordance with applicable law; and (2) what are the legal consequences of the decision on the parties based on statutory provisions. The research method used is normative juridical with descriptive-analytical specifications. The approaches used include the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. The data used are secondary data obtained from laws and regulations, legal literature, court decisions, and expert doctrines. The results of the study indicate that the judge's consideration stating that the Serang District Court was not authorized to adjudicate the a quo dispute was appropriate, because the object of the dispute concerns the validity of the administration of the issuance of land certificates which is the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court. The legal consequence of this decision is that the plaintiffs' lawsuit was declared inadmissible (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) and the parties were directed to pursue legal action in the State Administrative Court. The conclusion of this study is that the Serang District Court's decision aligns with the principle of legal certainty, as it provides clear boundaries regarding the judiciary's authority to examine and adjudicate land disputes. This research is expected to contribute to the development of civil law, particularly in the agrarian sector, and serve as a guideline for the public and legal practitioners in resolving land disputes.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Tingginya kompleksitas sengketa tanah di Indonesia, khususnya terkait tumpang tindih klaim kepemilikan yang bersumber dari penerbitan sertifikat tanah. Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 68/Pdt.G/2024/PN Srg yang menyatakan Pengadilan Negeri Serang tidak berwenang mengadili sudah sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku; dan (2) bagaimana akibat hukum putusan tersebut terhadap para pihak berdasarkan ketentuan perundang-undangan.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis. Pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, putusan pengadilan, serta doktrin para ahli.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim yang menyatakan Pengadilan Negeri Serang tidak berwenang mengadili sengketa a quo adalah tepat, sebab objek sengketa menyangkut keabsahan administrasi penerbitan sertifikat tanah yang menjadi kompetensi absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Akibat hukum dari putusan tersebut adalah gugatan para penggugat dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) dan para pihak diarahkan untuk menempuh upaya hukum di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang sejalan dengan prinsip kepastian hukum, karena memberikan batasan yang jelas mengenai kewenangan peradilan dalam memeriksa dan mengadili sengketa pertanahan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan hukum perdata, khususnya dalam bidang agraria, serta menjadi pedoman bagi masyarakat dan praktisi hukum dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tanah. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Authority to Adjudicate, Land Ownership Disputes, Certificates, Court Decisions. Kewenangan Mengadili, Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah, Sertifikat, Putusan Pengadilan. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KD England and Wales |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mr Rofiq Maulana Sandi | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 24 Oct 2025 02:02 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2025 02:02 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/55439 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |