Fachmi Rachmawan, Dio (2024) TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI KUALAS KAPUAS TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGEROYOKAN YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 133/Pid.B/2023/PN.Klk). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
SKRIPSI FIX BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (601kB) |
|
Text
SKRIPSI FIX BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (568kB) |
|
Text
SKRIPSI FIX BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (748kB) |
|
Text
SKRIPSI FIX BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (545kB) |
|
Text
SKRIPSI FIX DAFPUS.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (454kB) |
|
Text
CV BANG DIO KEREN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (7kB) |
|
Text
SRIPSI FINAL FIXX BANGETTT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
SRIPSI FINAL FIXX BANGETTT_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Two young people, namely Fajar and Roma have been sentenced to prison by a panel of judges at the Kuala Kapuas District Court for carrying out a beating that resulted death of a person named Wisjue. The Judges’s statement in the verdict number 133/Pid.B/2023/PN.Klk that there is no reason to eliminate criminal responsibility of the perpetrators is something that needs to be corrected, because according to the chronology of the prosecutor’s indictment they committed the act as a forced defense and a forced defense that went beyond limit. The Method used in this research is a normative juridical research method usinga statutory approach and a case approach. The data source used is a secondary data source, consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The action of the defendants were actions carried out based on a forced defense that exceeded the limits, both of these defenses fall into the category of criminal expunging reasons which should result in the defendants not being punished but rather being released from all legal charges. In this decision judges ignored the juridical facts contained in the indictment and witness statements, the judges only used his intuitive approach. When deciding cases, judges should truly appreciate and be thorough in assessing every legal fact revealed in the court, so that the verdict produced by the judges can be in accordance with existing legal rules.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Dua anak muda yakni Fajar dan Roma telah dihukum penjara oleh majelis hakim pengadilan negeri kuala kapuas karena melakukan pengeroyokan yang menyebabkan kematian terhadap seseorang bernama Wisjue. Pernyataan hakim dalam putusan nomor 133/Pid.B/2023/PN.Klk bahwa tidak ada alasan yang menghapuskan pertanggungjawaban pidana para pelaku merupakan suatu hal yang perlu dikoreksi, karena menurut kronologi dakwaan jaksa mereka melakukan perbuatan itu sebagai pembelaan terpaksa dan pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah sumber data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Perbuatan para terdakwa merupakan perbuatan yang dilakukan berdasarkan pembelaan terpaksa dan pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas, kedua pembelaan tersebut masuk dalam kategori alasan penghapus pidana yang seharusnya menyebabkan para terdakwa tidak dihukum melainkan diputus lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum. Pada putusan ini hakim mengabaikan fakta yuridis yang tercantum dalam dakwaan dan keterangan saksi, hakim hanya menggunakan pendekatanya yang bersifat intuitif. Seharusnya para hakim dalam memutus perkara harus benar-benar menghayati sekaligus teliti dalam menilai setiap fakta hukum yang terungkap di persidangan, sehingga putusan yang dihasilkan oleh seorang hakim bisa sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang ada. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Judge’s consideration, beating, reasons of expunging criminal charges. Pertimbangan Hakim, Pengeroyokan, Alasan penghapus pidana. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Dio Fachmi Rachmawan | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 10 Jan 2025 10:54 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 10 Jan 2025 10:54 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/45096 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |