DINAMIKA PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF CHECKS AND BALANCES

Zaydet Aruel, Razesti (2024) DINAMIKA PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF CHECKS AND BALANCES. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (482kB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (730kB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (657kB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (393kB)
	Text Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (478kB)
	Text (SKRIPSI) Razesti Zaydet Aruel_1111190225_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (387kB)

Abstract

Indonesia is a country of law in which there are those who are in charge according to the division of power in their government system. This is result of a form of the balance of power that existed after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The desire to avoid dictatorship, both open and covert and to build a democratic government, became an important background that encouraged the process of changing the 1945 Constitution in the reform era. Between the House of Representatives, the President, and Supreme Court, there is a relationship that can be broadly stated in two things, namely a relationship of cooperation and a relationship of supervision, therefore related to the authority between institutions in the formation of laws, whether the “checks and balances” system is working well in Indonesia , as well as the extent of the ability of the competent agencies in implementing the law formation mechanism. There are two problem identifications obtained from this research, namely: First, How is the implementation of checks and balances in the formation of laws after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution? Second, How is the relationship between institutions in the “checks and balances” mechanism of law formation after the 1945 Constitution amendment? The method used in this research is qualitative research, with a kind of normative juridical approach. The data source used is a secondary data source which is further divided into three, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, with the data collection technique of library studies which are then analyzed qualitatively and normatively by paying attention to some applicable laws and regulations. The first result of the research, the formation of the Law after the amendment still has many shortcomings, especially in the issuance of implementing regulations. Second, the mechanism of checks and balances in the process of formation of laws is still not optimal for inter-institutional supervision in which there is still a lack of legislative control over the executive

Item Type:

Thesis (S1)

Contributors:

Contribution	Contributors	NIP/NIM
Thesis advisor	Muin, Fatkhul	198311282009121002
Thesis advisor	Ludia Karsa, Pipih	198208112008121002

Additional Information:

Indonesia merupakan negara hukum yang dalam menjalani sistem pemerintahannya sudah ada yang bertugas masing-masing sesuai dengan pembagian kekuasaannya. Hal ini adalah bentuk dari balance of power yang eksis setelah amandemen UUD 1945. Keinginan untuk menghindari kediktatoran, baik terbuka maupun terselubung serta membangun pemerintahan yang demokratis, menjadi latar belakang yang penting yang mendorong proses perubahan UUD 1945 pada era reformasi Antara DPR, Presiden, dan MK terdapat hubungan yang secara garis besar dapat dinyatakan dalam dua hal, yaitu hubungan yang bersifat kerjasama dan hubungan yang bersifat pengawasan, maka dari itu terkait kewenangan antar lembaga dalam pembentukan undang-undang, apakah sistem “checks and balances” tersebut berjalan dengan baik di Indonesia, serta sejauh mana kemampuan antar lembaga yang berwenang dalam melaksanakan mekanisme pembentukan undang-undang tersebut. Terdapat dua identifikasi masalah yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini, yaitu: Pertama, Bagaimana implementasi checks and balances dalam pembentukan undang-undang setelah amandemen UUD 1945? Kedua, Bagaimana hubungan antar lembaga dalam mekanisme “checks and balances” pembentukan undang-undang setelah perubahan UUD 1945? Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif, dengan jenis pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah sumber data sekunder yang di dalamnya dibagi lagi menjadi tiga, yaitu bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka yang kemudian dianalisa secara kualitatif normatif dengan memperhatikan beberapa undang-undang dan peraturan hukum yang berlaku. Hasil Penelitian yang didapat pertama, Pembentukan UU pasca amandemen masih banyak kekurangan terutama pada penerbitan peraturan pelaksanaan. Kedua, mekanisme checks and balances dalam proses pembentukan UU masih belum optimal pengawasan antarlembaga di dalamnya di mana masih kurangnya kontrol legislatif akan eksekutif.

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Mechanism, Checks and Balances, Legislative Amendment. Mekanisme, Checks and Balances, Amandemen Undang-Undang.

Subjects:

K Law > K Law (General)

Divisions:

01-Fakultas Hukum
01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum

Depositing User:

RAZESTI ZAYDET ARUEL

Date Deposited:

17 Oct 2024 09:41

Last Modified:

17 Oct 2024 09:41

URI:

http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/43118

Actions (login required)

View Item

Search for collections on EPrints Repository UNTIRTA