Reginatha Monica, Gabriella (2024) JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS DECISION BETWEEN PT. CAHAYA ANGKASA ABADI AND PT. SURYA INTI JAYA MAKMUR. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (624kB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (478kB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (599kB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (203kB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_REFF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (457kB) |
|
Text
GABRIELLA REGINATHA MONICA_1111170132_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (551kB) |
Abstract
Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (is established to provide Debtors the opportunity to restructure their debts to avoid bankruptcy. Article 235 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law supports this by setting regulations that protect the interests of all parties involved in the PKPU process, including Debtors, Creditors, and third parties. The problem identified in this research is the legal considerations of the Surabaya Commercial Court judges in Decision Number 91/Pdt.sus PKPU/2021/PN.Sby in relation to the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law ( and the legal consequences arising from Decision Number 91/Pdt.sus PKPU/2021/PN.Sby. The results of this research show that the basis for the Surabaya Commercial Court judges' considerations in the decision regarding PT. Surya Inti Jaya Makmur and PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi are in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, although PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi's rights as a debtor regarding the amount of debt already paid are not protected, as they are still counted in the total accumulated debt. The payment of several debts by PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi through an agreement to send goods without a receipt and base d on trust cannot invalidate the lawsuit according to SEMA Number: 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020 concerning the difference in the amount of debt payment obligations not being a fundamental aspect to dismiss the application for suspension of debt payment obligations, in line with the principle of simple evidence to expedite court proceedings and reduce the costs for the debtor during the trial process, and the evidence in the commercial court process where the judge considers civil evidence, namely formal evidence, so the judge only considers written evidence and other evidence only to strengthen.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) hadir untuk memberikan kesempatan kepada Debitur untuk melakukan restrukturisasi utangnya untuk mencegah kepailitan. Dengan adanya Pasal 235 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, undang-undang ini mendukungnya dengan menetapkan peraturan yang melindungi kepentingan semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses PKPU, mulai dari Debitur, Kreditor, hingga pihak ketiga. Identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya dalam Putusan Nomor 91/Pdt.sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Sby dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dan bagaimana akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan dari Putusan Nomor 91/Pdt.sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Sby. Hasil dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dasar pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya dalam putusan PT. Surya Inti Jaya Makmur dengan PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, meskipun tidak terlindunginya hak PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi selaku debitur tentang jumlah utang yang sudah dibayar, namun masih terhitung dalam akumulasi jumlah hutang. Pembayaran beberapa jumlah utang oleh PT. Cahaya Angkasa Abadi dengan kesepakatan pembayaran dengan mengirimkan dalam bentuk barang tanpa tanda terima dan atas dasar rasa percaya. Perbedaan Jumlah Utang tersebut tidak dapat membatalkan gugatan sesuai dengan SEMA Nomor: 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020 tentang perbedaan angka kewajiban pembayaran utang bukan sebagai aspek dasar untuk menggugurkan permohonan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang, selaras dengan asas pembuktian sederhana agar proses persidangan berlangsung lebih cepat dan pihak debitur tidak banyak mengeluarkan biaya selama proses perkara, serta pembuktian dalam proses pengadilan niaga hakim mempertimbangkan pembuktian perdata yaitu pembuktian formil, sehingga hakim hanya mempertimbangkan alat bukti tertulis dan alat bukti lainnya hanya memperkuat. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PKPU, Kepailitan, Pengadilan Niaga PKPU, Bankruptcy, Commercial Court | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Gabriella Reginatha Monica | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 16 Aug 2024 15:46 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 16 Aug 2024 15:46 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/39449 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |