JAENUDIN, JAENUDIN (2017) ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF MATEMATIS SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Skripsi)
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF MATEMATIS SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR.PDF Restricted to Registered users only Download (17MB) |
Abstract
Jaenudin (2225130685), The analysis of mathematical Rfelective Students's Thingking Ability in Terms of Leaning Style (qualitative descriptive study in SMPN 4 Rangkasbitung) Thesis Department of Mathematics Education. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. Serang, 2017. The analysis of mathematical Rfelective Students's Thingking Ability in Terms of Leaning Style is a description of the student's ability in complete high-level issues based on the type of learning style. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with the aim to determine the ability of reflective thinking in terms of students' mathematical learning styles of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. This research subject is class VIII A in SMPN 4 Rangkasbitung selected by purposive sampling on the material side room flat wake. The result showed, students of visual, auditory and kinesthetic have not been able to identify the formula or concept used because it does not provide an overall answer. Students visual and kinesthetic students are able to evaluate correctly, clearly, less systematic, yet complete auditory while students are able to evaluate correctly, clear, systematic, and comprehensive. Students of visual and auditory students give incomplete answers and the wrong answer and does not provide an analogy while students kinesthetic give a complete answer, but the answer is wrong and does not give an analogy. Students visual giving incomplete calculations, the final answer is wrong and does not give the reasons generalization, auditory students provide correct calculations, the final answer is correct but does not give the reasons generalization while students kinesthetic provide correct calculations, the final answer is correct and give the reasons generalization. Students bahasannya own visual explain and correct answers, students auditory explained at length and explain the correct answers while students kinesthetic explain the correct answer. Students are already able to provide a visual interpretation but not yet complete and correct calculation, auditory students not able to give an interpretation, but the calculation is correct, while the kinesthetic students have been able to provide interpretation properly with the correct calculations
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Analisis kemampuan berpikir reflektif matematis siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar merupakan deskripsi tentang kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan tingkat tinggi berdasarkan tipe gaya belajarnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan berpikir reflektif matematis siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik. Subjek penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII A di SMPN 4 Rangkasbitung yang dipilih secara purposive Sampling pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan, siswa visual, auditorial dan kinestetik belum mampu mengidentifikasi rumus atau konsep yang digunakan karena tidak memberikan jawaban secara keseluruhan. Siswa visual dan siswa kinestetik mampu mengevaluasi dengan benar, jelas, kurang sistematis, namun lengkap sedangkan siswa auditorial mampu mengevaluasi dengan benar, jelas, sistematis, dan lengkap. Siswa visual dan siswa auditorial memberikan jawaban kurang lengkap dan jawaban salah serta tidak memberikan analogi sedangkan siswa kinestetik memberikan jawaban lengkap namun jawaban salah serta tidak memberikan analogi. Siswa visual memberikan perhitungan kurang lengkap, jawaban akhir salah dan tidak memberikan generalisasi disertai alasan, siswa auditorial memberikan perhitungan benar, jawaban akhir benar namun tidak memberikan generalisasi disertai alasan sedangkan siswa kinestetik memberikan perhitungan benar, jawaban akhir benar dan memberikan generalisasi disertai alasan. Siswa visual menjelaskan dengan bahasannya sendiri dan jawaban benar, siswa auditorial menjelaskan dengan menjelaskannya panjang lebar dan jawaban benar sedangkan siswa kinestetik menjelaskan dengan jawaban benar. Siswa visual sudah mampu memberikan interpretasi namun belum lengkap dan perhitungan benar, siswa auditorial belum mampu memberikan interpretasi namun perhitungan benar, sedangkan siswa kinestetik sudah mampu memberikan interpretasi dengan baik dengan perhitungan yang benar. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 84202-Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Admin Eprints Untirta | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2021 06:48 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 26 Oct 2021 06:48 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/3701 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |