Ayu Cahyani, Gita (2023) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DENGAN MODUS RITUAL PENGGANDAAN UANG (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 220/Pid.B/2021/PN Cbi). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (170kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (162kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (178kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (37kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (118kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
Gita Ayu Cahyani_1111190113_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (169kB) |
Abstract
In this era of globalization, fraud is often carried out with the help of magic, such as multiplying money as stated in decision number 220/Pid.B/2021/PN Cbi. The increasing prevalence of criminal acts of fraud using the mode of multiplying money must of course be followed by strict legal action and through applicable legal procedures. Identify the problem of this research, first, how to regulate criminal acts of fraud using the ritual mode of multiplying money in criminal law? Second, how to enforce criminal law against criminal acts of fraud using the ritual mode of multiplying money? The theories used in this research are the theory of the purpose of punishment and the theory of law enforcement. The research method used is a normative legal or normative juridical research method with a case study approach. The results of the research show a discrepancy between the sanctions applied with the aim of punishing perpetrators of criminal acts of fraud using the ritual mode of multiplying money as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code where the imposition of sanctions does not show justice if you look at the actions of the perpetrators who have committed criminal acts of fraud using the ritual mode of multiplying money repeatedly in the past as well as law enforcement against criminal acts of fraud using the ritual mode of multiply may not have been implemented optimally as several problems have been encountered which have become obstacles to law enforcement, namely legal factors, law enforcement factors and community factors. The conclusion is that the criminal sanctions regulated in Article 378 in their application to the case in decision number 220/Pid.B/2021/PN Cbi are still not optimal, as they have not demonstrated a sense of justice, and law enforcement also shows that it has not been implemented properly. The researcher's suggestion is that law enforcement officials must always be careful and firm in imposing criminal sanctions in order to produce just decisions, then in order to enforce the law, the synergy of all parties should be needed to contribute to creating good law enforcement.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Pada era globalisasi ini penipuan bahkan seringkali dilakukan dengan bantuan magis, seperti penggandaan uang sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam putusan nomor 220/Pid.B/2021/PN Cbi. Semakin maraknya tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus penggandaan uang ini tentunya harus diikuti oleh tindakan hukum yang tegas dan melalui prosedur hukum yang berlaku. Identifikasi masalah penelitian ini, pertama, bagaimana pengaturan mengenai tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus ritual penggandaan uang dalam hukum pidana? Kedua, bagaimana penegakan hukum pidana terhadap tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus ritual penggandaan uang? Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu teori tujuan pemidanaan dan teori penegakan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif atau yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketidaksesuaian dalam antara sanksi yang diterapkan dengan tujuan pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus ritual penggandaan uang sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 378 KUHP di mana penjatuhan sanksi tidak menunjukkan adanya keadilan jika melihat perbuatan pelaku yang telah melakukan tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus ritual penggandaan uang berulang kali sebelumnya serta penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana penipuan dengan modus ritual penggandaan sekiranya belum maksimal dilaksanakan sebagaimana ditemui beberapa masalah-masalah yang menjadi penghambat penegakan hukum, yaitu faktor hukum, faktor penegak hukum, dan faktor masyarakat. Kesimpulan bahwa sanksi pidana yang telah diatur dalam Pasal 378 dalam penerapannya pada kasus dalam putusan nomor 220/Pid.B/2021/PN Cbi masih belum maksimal di mana belum menunjukkan adanya rasa keadilan, serta penegakan hukumnya juga menunjukkan bahwa belum terlaksana dengan baik. Saran peneliti, yaitu aparat penegak hukum harus senantiasa cermat dan tegas dalam memberikan penjatuhan sanksi pidana agar terciptanya putusan yang berkeadilan, kemudian dalam rangka penegakan hukum seyogyanya dibutuhkan sinergi semua pihak untuk ikut berkontribusi dalam rangka menciptakan penegakan hukum yang baik. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fraud, Criminal Acts, Ritual Mode of Multiplying Money. Penipuan, Tindak Pidana, Modus Ritual Penggandaan Uang. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Miss Gita Ayu | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 22 Jan 2024 10:38 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 22 Jan 2024 10:38 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/32378 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |