PUTRA PRATAMA, PIJAR (2023) PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP PUTUSAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO 359/PID.SUS/2021/PN KTP). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

	Text (Skripsi) Pijar Putra Pratama_11111_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (800kB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (201kB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (178kB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (159kB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (12kB) | Request a copy
	Text Pijar Putra Pratama_1111190224_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (298kB) | Request a copy
	Text PIjar Putra Pratama_1111190224_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (97kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Narcotics are substance or drugs either synthetic, semi-synthetic, or natural that cause the effects of decreased consciousness, hallucinations, and cause addiction. Narcotics case in Indonesia from year to year have not decreased, even tend to increase. Therefore, the seriousness of law enforcement officials in tackling drug crime is highly expected, but un reality there are still many law enforcement officials, especially judges, giving light sanctions to drug recidive so that they do not have a deterrent effect and are not in accordance with the purpose of punishment. As for the identification of the first problem, How is the judge’s consideration of drug offenders (Case Study No. 359/Pid.Sus.2021/PN Ktp)?, How is the punishment of drug offenders?. The theories used are the judge’s Consideration Theory and the Theory of the Purpose of Punishment. Research Methods are normative juridical with data analysis through a qualitative approach, using secondary data sources consisting of three parts, namely primary, secondary, tertiary legal materials, with literature study data collection techniques. The results of the judge’s consideration in the Ketapang Court decision No 359/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Ktp, the judge gave a light sentence of imprisonment for 2 years to the perpetrators of narcotics recidivism without considering the evidence owned by the defendant and the judge did not consider aggravating matters so that the judge’s decision was considered not to provide justice and benefits for both the defendant and the community and did not achieve the purpose of punishment. In conclusion, the basis fot the judge’s consideration of the Ketapang District Court is wrong because in considering juridical, sociological, and philosophical erors have not been optimal so that the judge’s consideration can be used as a protector for recidive dealer or perpetrators who seem to be drug abusers or addicts so that the judge gives light sanctions of the defendant. Advice, judge’s in deciding case should be guided by the principle of justice and the purpose of the punishment it self and judges should also pay attention to juridical, sociological and philosophical considerations, in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, and expediency.

Item Type:	Thesis (S1)
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors NIP/NIM Thesis advisor MUHAMMAD FAJAR, NOOR 198207312006041003 Thesis advisor ROFIANA, REINE 198411222008122002
Additional Information:	Narkotika merupakan zat atau obat baik bersifat sintetis, semi sintetis, maupun alamiah yang menimbulkan efek penurunan kesadaran, halusinasi, serta menyebabkan kecanduan. Kasus narkotika di Indonesia dari tahun ke tahun tidak mengalami penurunan, bahkan cenderung mengalami kenaikan. Oleh karena itu, keseriusan aparat penegak hukum dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana narkotika sangat diharapkan, tetapi dalam kenyataannya masih banyak aparat penegak hukum khususnya hakim memberikan sanksi ringan terhadap pelaku residivis narkotika sehingga tidak memberikan efek jera dan tidak sesuai dengan tujuan pemidanaan
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Pertimbangan Hakim, Narkotika, Residivis judge's consideration, narcotics, recidive
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	Pijar Pratama
Date Deposited:	07 Dec 2023 11:03
Last Modified:	14 Dec 2023 11:30
URI:	http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/31351

Actions (login required)

View Item