Diana, Umi (2023) TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DALAM KASUS DUGAAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
UMI DIANA_2222190068_FULLTEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (314kB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (203kB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (758kB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (61kB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (128kB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
Umi Diana_2222190068_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The background to this research is the lack of language studies in the legal realm, one of which is language in trials, because not all interlocutors or trial participants are able to study and understand the intentions and objectives of speakers or judges, prosecutors or legal advisors. In trials of cases of alleged defamation, it is important to study pragmatics research because the role of language is interrelated with each other, including language, context and law. This research aims to find and identify various types of illocutionary speech acts in the trial broadcast of Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan's alleged defamation case against defendants Haris Azhar and Fatia Maulidiyanti. The theory used in this research is J. Searle's theory which classifies speech acts into five types, namely assertive, directive, commissive, expressive and declarative. This research method is a descriptive qualitative method. The data collection technique in this research uses Sudaryanto's theory, which consists of the observation method with basic tapping techniques and advanced techniques. Data analysis in this research uses interactive analysis techniques proposed by Miles and Huberman. The results of this research found 99 utterances, including 18 assertive utterances, 72 directive utterances, 6 commissive utterances, 3 expressive utterances. Meanwhile, the type of declarative speech act was not found. The results of this analysis and findings were used to develop Indonesian language teaching modules for class X/Phase E SMA/equivalent related to speaking elements in debate text material. Initial competencies in debate text material are (1) students can understand and construct the content of the debate, (2) students are able to analyze the structure of the debate, and (3) students are able to develop problems in the debate.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Latar belakang penelitian ini yaitu, minimnya pengkajian bahasa dalam ranah hukum salah satunya bahasa di persidangan, karena tidak semua mitra tutur atau peserta sidang mampu menelaah dan memahami maksud dan tujuan penutur atau hakim, JPU atau penasihat hukum. Pada sidang kasus dugaan pencemaran nama baik, menjadi penting untuk dikaji dalam penelitian pragmatik karena peran bahasa yang saling berkaitan antara satu dengan yang lainnya baik dengan bahasa, konteks, dan hukum. Penelitian ini bermaksud menemukan dan mengidentifikasi pelbagai jenis tindak tutur ilokusi pada Tayangan Sidang Kasus Dugaan Pencemaran Nama Baik Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan atas terdakwa Haris Azhar dan Fatia Maulidiyanti. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori J. Searle yeng mengklasifikasi tindak tutur ke dalam lima jenis yakni asertif, direktif, komisif, eksprestif dan deklaratif. Metode penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini menggunakan teori Sudaryanto yaitu terdiri atas metode simak dengan teknik dasar sadap dan teknik lanjutan. Analisis data pada penelitian ini yaitu, menggunakan teknik analisis interaktif yang dikemukakaan oleh Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian ini ditemukan 99 tuturan diantaranya, 18 tuturan asertif, 72 tuturan direktif, 6 tuturan komisif, 3 tuturan Ekspresif. Selain itu, terdapat 30 tuturan ilokusi hakim, 30 tuturan ilokusi Jaksa Penuntut Umum, dan 39 tuturan ilokusi Penasihat hukum. Hasil analisis dan temuan ini dimanfaatkan untuk menyusun modul ajar bahasa Indonesia kelas X/Fase E SMA/Sederajat yang berkaitan dengan elemen berbicara pada materi teks debat. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pragmatics, Illocutionary Speech Acts, Trial of Alleged Defamation Cases Pragmatik, Tindak Tutur Ilokusi, Sidang Kasus Dugaan Pencemaran Nama Baik | |||||||||
| Subjects: | L Education > LA History of education P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN0441 Literary History |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 88201-Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Umi Diana Diana | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2024 09:57 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 05 Jan 2024 09:57 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/31106 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |