Search for collections on EPrints Repository UNTIRTA

TINJAUAN HUKUM MENGENAI SENGKETA ANTARA BOSOWA GROUP DENGAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN MENGENAI HASIL PENILAIAN KEMBALI BOSOWA SELAKU PEMEGANG SAHAM PENGENDALI BANK BUKOPIN

Adestiana Liniasri, Dinna (2023) TINJAUAN HUKUM MENGENAI SENGKETA ANTARA BOSOWA GROUP DENGAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN MENGENAI HASIL PENILAIAN KEMBALI BOSOWA SELAKU PEMEGANG SAHAM PENGENDALI BANK BUKOPIN. S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_FULL TEXT.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_01.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_02.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (474kB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_03.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (357kB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_04.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (389kB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_05.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (201kB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_LAMP.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
DINA ADESTIANA LINIASARI_111160018_REFF.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (434kB)

Abstract

Bosowa 25 Agustus 2020, tidak dapat mengikuti Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa berdasarkan Surat Keputusan Dewan Komisioner OJK No. 64/Kdk.03/2020 dikarenakan Bosowa telah mengabaikan perintah OJK yang tertuang dalam Surat Perintah Tertulis OJK No. SR-17/D.03/2020 tanggal 10 Juni 2020 dan Surat Perintah No. SR-28/D.03/2020 tanggal 9 Juli, pemberian kuasa khusus kepada tim technical assistance dari PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk. Karena tidak melaksanakan surat perintah tersebut, OJK menetapkan Bosowa tidak lulus sebagai pemegang saham pengendali. Identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini yang pertama bagaimana dasar hukum pihak Bosowa Corpindo perihal keberatannya terhadap hasil penilaian kembali sebagai pemegang saham mayoritas Bukopin melalui Surat Keputusan Dewan Komisioner OJK No. 64/KDK.03/2020 dalam Kasus Sengketa Kepemilikan Saham Bank Bukopin dan yang kedua bagaimana Pertimbangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam menyatakan Bosowa tidak lulus dalam penilaian kembali sebagai pemegang saham mayoritas Bukopin melalui Surat Keputusan Dewan Komisioner OJK No. 64/KDK.03/2020. Penelitian ini bertujuan meneliti dasar hukum pihak Bosowa Corpindo prihal keberatannya terhadap hasil penilaian kembali sebagai pemegang saham mayoritas dan pertimbangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam menyatakan Bosowa tidak lulus dalam penilaian kembali sebagai pemegang saham mayoritas Bukopin. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum yuridis normatif menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data penelitian konsep dan kasus utama serta menggunakan pendekataan undang–undang (statue approach). Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah Otoritas Jasa Keuangan mengeluarkan Perintah Tertulis pada tanggal 9 Juli 2020 kepada Bosowa agar memberikan kuasa kepada Technical Assistant PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk untuk menyetujui agenda RUPSLB PMTHMETD paling lambat 31 Juli 2020, sampai tanggal 31 Juli 2020, Bosowa belum memenuhi Perintah Tertulis, Tergugat telah memberikan 3 (tiga) kali surat peringatan agar Bosowa segera memenuhi perintah tertulis tersebut, Bosowa menolak melaksanakan perintah tertulis. Saran penelitian ini seharusnya Bosowa selaku Pemegang Saham Pengendali bertanggung jawab untuk melakukan upaya yang diperlukan termasuk penambahan modal pada saat PT. Bank Bukopin Tbk/Tergugat Intervensi mengalami kesulitan keuangan sebagai Pemegang Saham Pengendali, Bosowa tidak memenuhi komitmen dan tanggung jawab untuk mendukung program penyehatan PT. Bank Bukopin Tbk/Tergugat Intervensi, melainkan justru melakukan langkah-langkah untuk menggagalkan proses penyelamatan PT. Bank Bukopin Tbk/Tergugat Intervensi.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIP/NIM
Thesis advisorSri Agustina, Rani197908032003122002
Thesis advisorSyahrul Mucharom, Rully198102252008121002
Additional Information: Bosowa 25 August 2020, was unable to participate in the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders based on OJK Board of Commissioners Decree No. 64/Kdk.03/2020 because Bosowa had ignored OJK orders contained in OJK Written Order No. SR-17/D. 03/2020 dated 10 June 2020 and Order No. SR-28/D.03/2020 dated July 9, gave special powers to the technical assistance team from PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk. Because he did not carry out the order, OJK determined that Bosowa did not qualify as controlling shareholder. The first problem discovered in this research is the legal basis for Bosowa Corpindo regarding its objection to the results of the reassessment as the majority shareholder of Bukopin through the Decree of the OJK Board of Commissioners No. 64/KDK.03/2020 in the Bank Bukopin Share Ownership Dispute Case and secondly how the Financial Services Authority (OJK) considered considering Bosowa did not pass the reassessment as the majority shareholder of Bukopin through OJK Board of Commissioners Decree No. 64/KDK.03/2020. This research aims to examine the legal basis for Bosowa Corpindo regarding its objection to the results of the reassessment as majority shareholder and the considerations of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in declaring that Bosowa did not pass the reassessment as the majority shareholder of Bukopin. This research uses a type of normative juridical legal research using secondary data as main concept and case research data and using a statutory approach (statue approach). The conclusion of this research is that the Financial Services Authority issued a written order on July 9 2020 to Bosowa to grant power of attorney to the PT Technical Assistant. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk to approve the PMTHMETD EGMS agenda no later than 31 July 2020, until 31 July 2020, Bosowa has not fulfilled the Written Order, the Defendant has given 3 (three) warning letters so that Bosowa immediately fulfills the written order, Bosowa refuse to carry out written orders. The suggestion of this research is that Bosowa as the Controlling Shareholder should be responsible for making the necessary efforts including additional capital when PT. Bank Bukopin Tbk/Intervening Defendant experienced financial difficulties as a Controlling Shareholder, Bosowa did not fulfill its commitment and responsibility to support PT's health program. Bank Bukopin Tbk/Defendant's intervention actually took steps to thwart the process of rescuing PT. Intervention of Bank Bukopin Tbk/Defendant.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Bosowa Corpindo, Pasar Modal Financial Services Authority, Bosowa Corpindo, Capital Markets
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: 01-Fakultas Hukum
01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: mrs Dinna Adestiana Liniasri
Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2023 11:56
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2023 11:56
URI: http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/30555

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item