KHOSYIYATI, IRNA (2023) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP LEGAL OFFICER DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGASNYA DI DALAM KORPORASI (STUDI KASUS LEGAL OFFICER PT. KIEC). Master thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP LEGAL OFFICER DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGASNYA DI DALAM KORPORAS.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (6MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (285kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (990kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (273kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (90kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (232kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
Irna Khosyiyati_7773190034_lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (770kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The background of this research is a bribery case involving Eka Wandoro in his capacity as Legal Officer of PT. KIEC on licensing efforts for the Transmart Mall project in Cilegon City. The sentence handed down to Eka Wandoro in the form of a sentence of 1.8 years in prison is a consequence of the verdict read by the panel of judges at the Serang District Court. Based on this case, the researcher examines the legal protection of legal officers who are employees of a corporation and not those who have the authority to determine the direction of corporate policy. This correlates with the criminal liability imposed on the Eka Wandoro case. Therefore, the researchers obtained several identification problems including, 1. how is legal protection for legal officers in carrying out their duties by taking case studies at PT. KIEC, and 2. how is the relevance of legal protection for legal officers with criminal acts that ensnare legal officers at PT. KIEC in the case of the Transmart Mall. This study uses a normative juridical research method by reviewing the applicable laws and regulations as well as theories in the literature. This research approach is a statutory approach. The theory used in this research is identification theory and vicarious liability theory. The results of this study concluded that, based on identification theory which sees the most benefited party or the directing mind in the Eka Wandoro case, the legal officer is not the party who can determine corporate policy and also only as an extension of the Board of Directors based on the Company Law. Limited is the most responsible party in the cooperative before the court. Therefore, this case must be viewed from the perspective of corporate responsibility in order to provide legal protection for legal officers in the corporation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Master) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah kasus penyuapan yang melibatkan Eka Wandoro dalam kapasitasnya sebagai Legal Officer PT. KIEC pada upaya perizinan proyek Transmart Mal di Kota Cilegon. Pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada Eka Wandoro berupa hukuman 1,8 tahun penjara merupakan konsekuensi dari vonis yang dibacakan majelis hakim pada Pengadilan Negeri Serang. Berdasarkan kasus tersebut peneliti mengkaji mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap legal officer yang merupakan pegawai dari suatu korporasi dan bukan pihak yang mempunyai wewenang untuk menentukan arah kebijakan korporasi. Hal ini berkorelasi dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana yang dikenakan pada kasus Eka Wandoro tersebut. Maka dari itu peneliti mendapatkan beberapa identifikasi masalah diantaranya, 1. bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap legal officer dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dengan mengambil studi kasus pada PT. KIEC, dan 2. bagaimana relevansi perlindungan hukum legal officer dengan tindak pidana yang menjerat legal officer PT. KIEC dalam kasus Mal Transmart. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan mengkaji peraturan perundangundangan yang berlaku serta teori dalam literatur. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori identifikasi dan teori pertanggungjawaban pengganti (vicarious liability). Hasil penelitian ini didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa, berdasarkan teori identifikasi yang melihat pihak yang paling diuntungkan atau otak utama (directing mind) dalam kasus Eka Wandoro tersebut maka legal officer bukanlah pihak yang dapat menentukan kebijakan korporasi dan juga hanya sebagai kepanjangan tangan dari Direksi yang berdasarkan UU Perseoran Terbatas adalah pihak yang paling bertanggungjawab dalam Koporasi didepan persidangan. Maka dari itu, kasus ini harus dipandang pada sudut pandang pertanggungjawaban korporasi guna memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap legal officer dalam korporasi. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Legal Officer, Criminal Liability, Corporate Legal Officer, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Korporasi | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 08-Pascasarjana 08-Pascasarjana > 74101-Magister Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Irna Khosyiyati | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 20 Sep 2023 09:19 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 20 Sep 2023 09:19 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/29208 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |