RACHMAWATI, YESI (2023) ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS PRAKIK DISKRIMINASI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (PERSERO) TBK, DAN PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI SELULER TERHADAP NETFLIX DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (264kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (171kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (160kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (35kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (255kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (115kB) |
|
Text
Yesi Rachmawati_1111180420_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (624kB) |
Abstract
Discriminatory practices include refusing to enter into a business relationship at all, refusing to enter into a business relationship at all, refusing to meet certain conditions or other actions, where other business actors are not treated in the same way. This action was carried out by PT. Telkom and PT. Telkomsel towards netflix which causes a loss impact without any explanation which is then linked to article Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Based on this background, the problem examined in this study is how discriminatory practices take the form of blocking carried out by PT. Telkom and PT. Telkomsel against Netflix? And is the KPPU's decision regarding cases of discriminatory practices in the form of blocking actions carried out by PT. Telkom and PT. Has Telkomsel created legal certainty for Netflix? The framework of thought in this research is the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal protection. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The results of the study revealed that there was evidence of discriminatory practices committed by PT. Telkom and PT. Telkomsel, with various motives, did this by blocking Netflix as a Subscription Based Video on Demand (SVOD) provider so that PT. Telkom and PT. Telkomsel cannot enjoy the Netflix service. The researcher is of the opinion that KPPU should pay close attention to the fulfillment of each element listed in the articles that have been violated, especially in the articles whose application is the rule of reason and provisions that are excluded in Law No. 5 of 1999.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Praktik diskriminasi termasuk menolak sama sekali melakukan hubungan usaha, menolak melakukan sama sekali hubungan usaha, menolak syarat-syarat tertentu atau perbuatan lain, dimana pelaku usaha lain tidak diperlakukan dengan cara yang sama. Tindakan tersebut dilakukan oleh PT. Telkom dan PT. Telkomsel terhadap netflix yang menimbulkan dampak kerugian tanpa ada sebuah penjelasan yang kemudian dihubungkan dengan pasal Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana praktik diskriminasi berupa tindakan pemblokiran yang dilakukan oleh PT. Telkom dan PT. Telkomsel terhadap Netflix? dan Apakah putusan KPPU mengenai perkara atas praktik diskriminasi berupa Tindakan pemblokiran yang dilakukan oleh PT.Telkom dan PT.Telkomsel terhadap Netflix sudah mewujudkan kepastian hukum?. Kerangka pemikiran dalam penelitian ini adalah teori kepastian hukum dan teori perlindungan hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa terbukti adanya tindakkan praktik diskriminasi yang diakukan PT. Telkom dan PT. Telkomsel dengan berbagai motif, dilakukannya dengan cara memblokir Netflix sebagai penyedia Subscription Based Video on Demand (SVOD) sehingga pelanggan PT. Telkom dan PT. Telkomsel tidak dapat menikmati layanan Netflix. Peneliti berpendapat bahwa KPPU seharusnya mencermati pemenuhan dari setiap unsur yang tercantum dalam pasal yang telah dilanggar terutama dalam pasal-pasal yang penerapannya bersifat rule of reason dan ketentuan yang dikecualikan dalam Undang-Undang No 5 Tahun 1999. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Discriminatory Practices, Legal Certainty, Legal Protection Praktik Diskriminasi, Kepastian Hukum, Perlindungan Hukum | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Yesi Rachmawati | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2023 09:33 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2023 09:33 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/28829 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |