Jelang Fajar, Tubagus (2023) TINJAUAN HUKUM PEMBATALAN HIBAH KEPADA ANAK ANGKAT MENURUT KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) (Studi Putusan Nomor 1637/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_FULL TEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (512kB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (461kB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (492kB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (186kB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_REFF.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (429kB) |
|
Text
Tubagus Jelang Fajar_1111180307_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (678kB) |
Abstract
In the case of the decision, Nurhamidah Nasution and Abu Bakar MS filed a lawsuit against Rusmaini Binti Jamaludin because they were considered disobedient by expelling, threatening and speaking harshly feeling hurt and disappointed, therefore the Plaintiffs intended to cancel the grant. Identification of the problem in this research is, Is the reason for canceling grants to adopted children according to the Compilation of Islamic law (KHI) in case No.1637/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP? And what are the judge's legal considerations in decision No.1637/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP in accordance with the applicable legal provisions? The theory used is the theory of legal protection and the theory of legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical. The specifications in this study are descriptive-analytical by using only secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research. The technique used in data collection was carried out by means of library research. The data that has been obtained is then analyzed through a qualitative descriptive analysis approach. The results of this study, the reasons for canceling grants to adopted children for reasons of disobedience are not in accordance with the KHI, the provisions in the KHI do not regulate the cancellation of grants but the withdrawal of grants in article 212 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, but can be canceled if the grantor gives more than 1 /3 his assets, the cancellation of the grant in this decision the Panel of Judges is of the opinion that the Plaintiffs' claim to revoke the grant is not sufficiently reasoned and not proven, so it is fitting that the Plaintiff's lawsuit be rejected, because the reason for the cancellation is due to disobedient children and according to legal provisions there is no such reason, thus the judge's decision is correct.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Dalam kasus putusan tersebut, Nurhamidah Nasution dan Abu Bakar MS mengajukan gugatan pada Rusmaini Binti Jamaludin karena di anggap durhaka mengusir, mengancam dan berkata kasar merasa sakit hati dan kecewa oleh karena itu Para Penggugat bermaksud membatalkan hibah tersebut . Identifikasi masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah, Apakah alasan pembatalan hibah kepada anak angkat sesuai didalam Kompilasi hukum Islam (KHI) pada perkara No.1637/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP ? Serta Apa pertimbangan hukum hakim pada putusan No.1637/Pdt.G/2019/PA.JP telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku ? Teori yang digunakan adalah teori perlindungan hukum dan teori kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi dalam penelitian ini bersifat Deskriptif-Analitis dengan hanya menggunakan sumber data sekunder saja yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Teknik yang dipergunakan dalam pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara penelitian kepustakaan atau libary research. Data-data yang telah diperoleh tersebut kemudian dianalisa dengan melalui pendekatan secara analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, Alasan pembatalan hibah terhadap anak angkat karena alasan durhaka tidak sesuai dengan KHI, ketentuan di dalam KHI tidak di atur tentang pembatalan hibah melainkan penarikan kembali hibah dalam pasal 212 Kompilasi Hukum Islam, namun dapat dibatalkan jika si pemberi hibah memberikan melibihi 1/3 hartanya, Pembatalan hibah dalam putusan ini Majelis Hakim berpendapat gugatan Para Penggugat untuk mencabut hibah, tidak cukup beralasan dan tidak terbukti, sehingga sudah sepatutnya gugatan Penggugat ditolak, sebab alasan pembatalan karena anak durhaka dan menurut ketentuan hukum alasan tersebut tidak ada, dengan demikian maka putusan hakim sudah tepat. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Grant, Cancellation of Grant, Adopted Child Hibah, Pembatalan Hibah, Anak Angkat | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mr Tubagus Jelang Fajar | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2023 14:57 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2023 14:57 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/28677 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |