Indriani, Vetty (2023) Application of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2002 Concerning Group or Class Action Lawsuit Procedures in Settlement of Land Lawsuits in Bojonegara (Case Study of Serang District Court Decision Number 78/Pdt.G/2019/PN Srg). Master thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

	Text Vetty Indriani _773190083_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_CP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (148kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (249kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (240kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (165kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (34kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (173kB)
	Text Vetty Indriani_7773190083_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)

Abstract

The background of this research is the existence of a class action lawsuit represented by 3 group representatives including Kampung Solor Kidul, Kampung Solor Lor, and Desa Margagiri, Bojonegara District, Serang Regency against the Port Business Entity PT Bandar Bakau Jaya whose business activities are as a provider of loading and unloading port services and crossings that carry out loading and unloading activities every day so that it damages the function of the village road and loses the freedom of access to use the road for the villagers. The research method is a descriptive analytical research method, so the data analysis used is an analysis with a qualitative approach. The application of a class action or class action lawsuit in the decision of the Serang District Court Number 78/Pdt.G/2019/PN Srg applies the principle of simple, fast and low-cost justice because it can directly fulfill all the demands of a group of people with relatively low costs and the judge's legal considerations in the Serang District Court Decision Number 78/Pdt.G/2019/PN Srg did not see any immaterial loss as a legal consideration for the judge in making a decision on the lawsuit. The panel of judges stated that the claim could not be accepted because determining the replacement in the lawsuit was not clear because there was no real evidence. Even though this certainty regarding compensation for damages also fulfills the purpose of the class action itself, where compensation as a civil law sanction can be imposed to resolve disputes in court through a class action lawsuit.

Item Type:	Thesis (Master)
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors NIP/NIM Thesis advisor USMAN, SUPARMAN 150041187 Thesis advisor GUNAWATI, ANNE 19730420201012001
Additional Information:	Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya gugatan perwakilan kelompok yang diwakili oleh 3 wakil kelompok diantaranya Kampung Solor Kidul, Kampung Solor Lor, dan Desa Margagiri, Kecamatan Bojonegara, Kabupaten Serang melawan Badan Usaha Pelabuhan PT Bandar Bakau Jaya yang kegiatan usahanya sebagai penyedia jasa pelabuhan bongkar muat dan penyeberangan yang setiap hari melakukan aktivitas bongkar muat kendaraan sehingga merusak gangguan fungsi jalan kampung dan kehilangan kebebasan akses penggunaan jalan bagi warga desa tersebut. Metode penelitian metode penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analitis, maka analisis data yang dipergunakan adalah analisis secara pendekatan kualitatif. Penerapan gugatan perwakilan kelompok atau class action dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 78/Pdt.G/2019/PN Srg menerapkan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan karena dapat secara langsung memenuhi seluruh tuntutan sekelompok orang dengan biaya yang relatif rendah dan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 78/Pdt.G/2019/PN Srg tidak melihat adanya kerugian immaterial sebagai pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam membuat putusan pada gugatan tersebut. Majelis hakim menyatakan gugatan tidak dapat diterima karena dalam menentukan penggantian dalam gugatan tidak jelas karena belum ada bukti yang nyata. Padahal kepastian mengenai ganti ini rugi ini turut memenuhi tujuan daripada class action itu sendiri, dimana ganti rugi sebagai sanksi hukum perdata dapat dijatuhkan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa di dalam peradilan melalui gugatan perwakilan kelompok (class action).
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Class action, recognition of rights, legal certainty. Gugatan perwakilan kelompok, pengakuan hak, kepastian hukum.
Subjects:	K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions:	08-Pascasarjana > 74101-Magister Ilmu Hukum 08-Pascasarjana
Depositing User:	Mrs VETTY INDRIANI
Date Deposited:	13 Jul 2023 15:48
Last Modified:	14 Jul 2023 11:03
URI:	http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/26341

Actions (login required)

View Item