Shella Shasti, Miranti (2023) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK TERSANGKA ATAS PENYIKSAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PENYIDIK SKRIPSI. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (361kB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (533kB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (385kB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (201kB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (348kB) |
|
Text
Shella Shasti Miranti_1111180151_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (92kB) |
Abstract
A suspect is a person who is considered to have committed a criminal act and must be protected by his rights in seeking justice for himself under the law. Protection of the rights of suspects is stated in the KUHAP, Law Number 39 of 1999, and Law Number 12 of 2005. Suspect Kaharuddin was found that he was not given protection in the form of the rights of suspects which apply in the Criminal procedure regulations. In that case, it was discovered that the suspect was not granted his rights until he died. Based on this background, the problem studied in this study is what are the legal consequences for suspects who at the examination stage get arbitrary treatment from investigators? And what is the legal protection of the rights of suspects at the stage of the suspect examination process carried out by the investigator?. The framework of thought in this study is the theory of the principles of Criminal procedural law and the theory of legal protection. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The results of the study found that the accused Kaharuddin in the examination stage of the investigator had received arbitrary treatment that was not in accordance with the principle of presumption of innocence and the principle of acusatoir so that the examination of Kaharuddin must be declared null and void. And the suspect in this case does not receive legal protection for the rights of the suspect not to be tortured, therefore he must be compensated for the losses he has suffered. Researchers argue that a suspect should be respected for his rights and at the examination stage, a suspect should be viewed as a subject and have the right to freely give information without any pressure in any form and by anyone
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Tersangka merupakan seseorang yang dianggap melakukan tindak pidana dan wajib dilindungi hak-hak nya dalam mencari keadilan untuk dirinya berdasarkan hukum. Perlindungan terhadap hak-hak tersangka tercantum dalam Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005. Tersangka Kaharuddin ditemukan bahwa tidak diberikan perlindungan berupa hak-hak tersangka yang berlaku dalam peraturan acara Pidana. Dalam kasus tersebut diketahui tersangka tidak diberikan hak-hak nya sampai mengakibatkan meninggal dunia. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah akibat hukum terhadap tersangka yang pada tahap pemeriksaan mendapatkan perlakuan kesewenang-wenangan dari penyidik? Dan bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak tersangka pada tahap proses pemeriksaan tersangka yang dilakukan oleh penyidik?. Kerangka pemikiran dalam penelitian ini adalah teori asas-asas hukum acara Pidana dan teori perlindungan hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa tersangka Kaharuddin dalam tahap pemeriksaan penyidik telah mendapatkan perlakukan kesewenangwenangan yang tidak sesuai dengan asas praduga tidak bersalah dan asas acusatoir sehingga pemeriksapan terhadap Kaharuddin harus dinyatakan batal demi hukum dan tidak sah. Serta tersangka dalam kasus ini tidak mendapat perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak tersangka untuk tidak disiksa, maka dari itu harus diberikan ganti rugi atas kerugian yang telah dialaminya. Peneliti berpendapat bahwa seorang tersangka haruslah dihormati hak-hak nya serta pada tahap pemeriksaan, seorang tersangka harus dipandang sebagai subjek dan berhak secara bebas dalam memberikan keterangan tanpa adanya tekanan dalam bentuk apapun dan oleh siapapun. | |||||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Kata Kunci : Pemeriksaan Tersangka, Asas Hukum Acara Pidana, Perlindungan Hukum Keywords: Examination of Suspects, Principles of Criminal Procedure Law, Legal Protection | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum | |||||||||
| Depositing User: | shella shasti miranti | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2023 11:46 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 16 Mar 2023 11:46 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/22205 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |