YANTI SARAGIH, RISDAMAI (2023) PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN PN. NIAGA SURABAYA NOMOR: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-NIAGA SBY OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1265 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021 TERHADAP DUGAAN PELANGGARAN PASAL 22 UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 1999 TERKAIT PERSEKONGKOLAN TENDER DALAM PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG KOLAM RENANG TAHAP II DI KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI SELATAN. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (884kB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (426kB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (159kB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (168kB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (41kB) |
|
Text
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (184kB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
RISDAMAI YANTI SARAGIH_1111180329_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (533kB) |
Abstract
One of the activities prohibited under business competition law in Indonesia is tender conspiracy, one of which is KPPU Number: 05/KPPU-I/2020. The KPPU's decision was canceled by PN Niaga Surabaya Number: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby due to the imposition of elements of Article 22 on the reported party IV (Pokja). KPPU filed an appeal and in decision Number: 1265 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021 regarding violations of article 22 that PN Niaga Surabaya had applied the law incorrectly so that in this case the decision was canceled. Identification of the first problem, what are the considerations of the judges of the supreme court in canceling the District Court decision. Niaga Sby Number: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby regarding the violation of article 22. Second, what are the legal consequences of the cassation decision that canceled decision Number: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby. The theory used is the theory of legal certainty. The research method uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of statutory and case approaches, the data source used is secondary data and is supported by primary data through interviews, data collection techniques are in the form of literature studies, data analysis is in the form of qualitative analysis. The results showed that the reported party IV (Pokja) was included in the imposition of elements of Article 22, namely elements of other parties related to other business actors in business competition law. The conclusion is that the consideration of the judges of the supreme court against the reported party IV is included in the violation of Article 22 and the commercial court has been proven wrong and the legal consequences of canceling the PN decision. Niaga Surabaya has manifested itself as a result of a new legal situation, namely Decision Number: 1265 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021. The author's suggestion is that a broader elaboration of the elements of other parties is included in the guidebook of article 22 and it is hoped that commercial court judges will be able to understand various rules regarding tender conspiracy.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Kegiatan yang dilarang dalam hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia salah satunya adalah persekongkolan tender, salah satu kasusnya yaitu KPPU Nomor: 05/KPPU-I/2020. Putusan KPPU tersebut dibatalkan oleh PN Niaga Surabaya Nomor: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby dikarenakan pengenaan unsur pasal 22 pada terlapor IV (Pokja). KPPU mengajukan kasasi dan dalam putusan Nomor: 1265 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021 terkait pelanggaran pasal 22 bahwa PN Niaga Surabaya telah salah menerapkan hukum sehingga dalam hal ini terjadi pembatalan putusan. Identifikasi masalah yang pertama, Apakah pertimbangan hakim mahkamah agung dalam membatalkan putusan PN. Niaga Sby Nomor: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby terkait pelanggaran pasal 22. Kedua, Bagaimana akibat hukum atas putusan kasasi yang membatalkan putusan Nomor: 1/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021/PN-Niaga Sby. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian berupa pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus, sumber data yang digunakan yaitu data sekunder serta ditunjang oleh data primer melalui wawancara, teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi kepustakaan, analisis data berupa analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terlapor IV (Pokja) termasuk di dalam pengenaan unsur pasal 22 yaitu unsur pihak lain yang terkait dengan pelaku usaha lain dalam hukum persaingan usaha. Kesimpulan yaitu pertimbangan hakim mahkamah agung terhadap terlapor IV termasuk dalam pelanggaran pasal 22 dan pengadilan niaga telah terbukti keliru serta akibat hukum pada pembatalan putusan PN. Niaga Surabaya tersebut menimbulkan wujud akibat keadaan hukum baru yaitu Putusan Nomor: 1265 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021. Saran penulis adalah penjabaran lebih luas mengenai unsur pihak lain dimuat dalam buku pedoman pasal 22 dan pada hakim pengadilan niaga diharapkan mampu memahami berbagai aturan mengenai persekongkolan tender. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | |||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Risdamai Yanti Saragih | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 23 Feb 2023 15:21 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 23 Feb 2023 15:21 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/21878 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |