Suhendri, Suhendri (2023) TINJAUAN VIKTIMOLOGI TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM KASUS ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN PERSETUBUHAN (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor : 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.SRG). S1 thesis, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_Fulltext .pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (397kB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (302kB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (382kB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (214kB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (95kB) |
|
Text
Suhendri_1111170273_Lapm.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
Abstract
The case of the child victim of sexual intercourse received less attention from the Panel of Judges in its decision. Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg the court does not provide enough protection for child victims of sexual intercourse. Judges have not taken a victimological perspective in making their decisions, even though child victims of sexual intercourse need protection contained in the decision judge's. For example Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. Therefore, the identification of the problem of this thesis is first, how is the victimological review of the judge's consideration in the case of children as victims of intercourse in the Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. Second, how to protect the victims of the rights of children who are victims of internal promiscuity in the Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. The theory used in this research is the theory ratio decidendi in the perspective of victimology and the theory victim protection with service model. The research method used is juridical normative with research specifications descriptive analytical. The data source used is secondary data with library data collection techniques. Data analyzed were using analysis data qualitative. The results of the study were reviewed in terms of victimology the protection of child victims of sexual intercourse did not provide enough protection in the Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. The juridical and non-juridical aspects of the victim's child are not considered in this decision. Theoretically ratio decidendi judge's is only related to the interests of the perpetrator. In the Decision District Court Serang Number: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg there is no protection for the rights of child victims in the form of restitution, this is not in accordance with the service model in Regulation Government Number 43 the year 2017 concerning the Implementation Restitution for Children Victims Criminal Act. Child victims who are physically injured and traumatized should receive protection both physically and psychologically. This should have been included in the decision in the form of restitution for the victim's child. Judges in deciding cases of child victims of sexual intercourse not only consider aspects of the perpetrator but also must consider the overall juridical and non-juridical aspects of child victims of sexual intercourse in order to receive protection and restitution in accordance with law and regulations.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Kasus anak korban persetubuhan kurang mendapatkan perhatian dari Majelis Hakim dalam putusannya. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg pengadilan kurang memberikan perlindungan bagi anak korban persetubuhan. Hakim belum berperspektif viktimologi dalam menjatuhkan putusannya, anak korban persetubuhan yang memerlukan perlindungan dimuat didalam putusan hakim. Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg ini belum memberikan perlindungan terhadap korban anak persetubuhan. Oleh karena itu, identifikasi masalah skripsi ini adalah pertama, bagaimana tinjauan viktimologi terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus anak sebagai korban persetubuhan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. Kedua, bagaimana perlindungan korban terhadap hak-hak anak korban persetubuhan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor : 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.SRG. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian yaitu, teori ratio decidendi dalam perspektif viktimologi dan teori perlindungan korban dengan model pelayanan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan data kepustakaan. data dianalisis menggunakan analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ditinjau secara viktimologi perlindungan anak korban persetubuhan kurang memberikan perlindungan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg. Aspek yuridis maupun non yuridis anak korban kurang dipertimbangan dalam putusan tersebut. Secara teori ratio decidendi pertimbangan hakim hanya berkaitan dengan kepentingan pelaku saja. Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor: 756/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Srg belum terdapat perlindungan hak anak korban berupa restitusi hal itu tidak sesuai dengan model pelayanan yang ada dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana. Seharusnya anak korban yang mengalami luka fisik dan mengalami traumatis mendapatkan perlindungan baik secara fisik dan psikologis. Hal itu seharusnya termuat didalam putusan berupa restitusi untuk anak korban. hakim dalam memutus perkara anak korban persetubuhan tidak hanya mempertimbangkan aspek pelaku saja melainkan juga harus mempertimbangkan aspek yuridis dan non yuridis secara keseluruhan anak korban persetubuhan agar mendapatkan perlindungan dan restitusi sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum | |||||||||
| Depositing User: | mr Suhendri suhendri | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2023 15:50 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 18 Jan 2023 15:50 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/19925 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |