Ahdad, Amirulloh (2023) TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PANDEGLANG NOMOR : 28/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Pdl TENTANG PENISTAAN AGAMA. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.

	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_Fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_ 03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (986kB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (932kB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (865kB)
	Text Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (853kB)
	Text (SKRIPSI) Amirulloh Ahdad_1111180295_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (691kB)

Abstract

The case in this study occurred when Alnoldy Bahari, a resident of Kampung Gadog, Cibitung District, Pandeglang Regency, made a post on his Facebook account that intersects with religion. On November 25, 2017, Alnoldy received a WhatsApp message from Yayan asking Alnoldy and his wife to clarify the Facebook status post on November 27 to residents of Kampung Gadog who were worried about reading their statuses. However, on November 26, it was canceled and the next day Alnoldy was taken into custody by the Cibaliung Police. Until then in early December 2017, Alnoldy was named a suspect for cases of blasphemy and hate speech. Based on this background, the problems studied in this study are regarding the basis of the judge's legal considerations in imposing a 5-year sentence in prison on the perpetrators of blasphemy and the consequences of failing to prove the Double Opzet element (the element of layered error) by the prosecutor against the 5-year sentence handed down to the perpetrator. blasphemy. This research was conducted using a normative juridical method. The research approach uses a legal approach. The data sources used are primary data sources supported by secondary data and then analyzed qualitatively. This study resulted in the conclusion that the judge issued a decision without completely including the facts of the trial in its entirety. Because the Panel of Judges only used the testimony of witnesses and experts who incriminate the defendant to establish facts while expert witnesses from forensics were not presented who should have participated in being presented before the trial because in order to test the originality and authenticity of the FB (Facebook) status the defendant was ignored by the panel of judges. it should also be possible to prove whether or not the double income element of the defendant's actions is fulfilled, namely the existence of two elements that must be fulfilled, including mens rea and actus reus and there is a procedure defect so that the proof is premature. Judex facti/High Court in its considerations hesitated by saying that the integrity of the screenshot was not maintained and the Public Prosecutor did not perform digital forensics on the Facebook status which was used as the basis for the indictment, but the Judge still declared the Defendant guilty for his actions.

Item Type:	Thesis (S1)
Contributors:	Contribution Contributors NIP/NIM Thesis advisor RIDWAN, RIDWAN 197204032006041002 Thesis advisor ROFIANA, REINE 198411222008122002
Additional Information:	Kasus dalam penelitian ini terjadi ketika Alnoldy Bahari warga Kampung Gadog, Kecamatan Cibitung, Kabupaten Pandeglang membuat Postingan di akun Facebook yang bersinggungan dengan keagamaan. Pada 25 November 2017, Alnoldy menerima pesan WhatsApp dari Yayan yang meminta Alnoldy dan istrinya untuk mengklarifikasi postingan status Facebook pada 27 November kepada warga Kampung Gadog yang resah membaca status-statusnya. Namun pada 26 November hal tersebut dibatalkan dan keesokan harinya Alnoldy diamankan oleh Polres Cibaliung. Hingga kemudian pada awal Desember 2017, Alnoldy ditetapkan sebagai tersangka untuk kasus penodaan agama dan ujaran kebencian. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana 5 tahun penjara terhadap pelaku penistaan agama dan akibat hukum terdakwa terhadap vonis 5 tahun yang dijatuhkan kepada pelaku penistaan agama. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah sumber data primer didukung oleh data sekunder kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa Hakim mengeluarkan putusan tanpa sama sekali memasukkan fakta persidangan dengan utuh. Karena Majelis Hakim, hanya menggunakan keterangan para saksi dan ahli yang memberatkan terdakwa untuk membangun fakta sedangkan saksi ahli dari forensik tidak dihadirkan yang seharusnya turut serta dihadirkan di muka persidangan karena guna menguji orisinalitas dan otentisitas status FB (Facebook) terdakwa diabaikan oleh majelis hakim yang dimana seharusnya dari hal tersebut dapat juga untuk membuktikan terpenuhi atau tidak nya unsur double opzet dari perbuatan terdakwa yaitu adanya dua unsur yang harus terpenuhi antara lain mens rea dan actus reus dan terjadi cacat prosedur sehingga pembuktiannya bersifat premature. Judex facti/Pengadilan Tinggi dalam pertimbangannya ragu-ragu dengan mengatakan bahwa screenshoot tidak terjaga integritasnya dan Penuntut Umum tidak melakukan digital forensik terhadap status Facebook yang dijadikan dasar dakwaan, namun Hakim tetap menyatakan Terdakwa bersalah atas perbuatannya.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords: Blasphemy, Judge's Decision, judge's judgment, judge's legal consequences Kata Kunci : Penistaan Agama, Putusan Hakim, Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim , Akibat Hukum
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	Mr Amirulloh Ahdad
Date Deposited:	24 May 2023 14:32
Last Modified:	24 May 2023 14:32
URI:	http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/19409

Actions (login required)

View Item