Gumanti, Siti (2022) PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBING PROMTING LEARNING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPA. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (455kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (98kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (139kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (68kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (22kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_Ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (8kB) |
|
Text
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_FULLTEXT.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
SITI GUMANTI_2227150029_LAMP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The application of the probing prompting learning model to students' critical thinking skills in science subjects. A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design. The research was conducted at SD Negeri Sumur Peuteuy. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. In this study, class IV A was used as the experimental class and class IV B as the control class. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in students' critical thinking skills using the probing prompting learning model and students using the direct learning model. The purpose of the data analysis technique is to test the hypothesis using two tests and the right-hand side test. Based on the two-party hypothesis, tcount = 4,599 and ttable 2,010 so 4,599 > 2,010, meaning Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. From this research, it can be said that the learning model applied in the experimental class (probing prompting learning model) and in the control class (direct learning model) shows the students' critical thinking skills. And the experimental class is better than the control class.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | Penerapan model pembelajaran probing promting learning terhadap kemampuan berfikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA. Sebuah penelitian kuasi eskperimen dengan desain penelitian non equivalent control group design. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SD Negeri Sumur Peuteuy. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan kelas IV A sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas IV B sebagai kelas control. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk Untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang menggunakan model probing promting learning dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Tujuan teknik analisis data untuk pengujian hipotesis menggunakan dua uji dan uji sisi kanan. Berdasarkan perhitungan hipotesis dua pihak diperoleh thitung = 4.599 serta ttabel 2.010 sehingga 4.599 > 2.010, artinya Ho ditolak dan Ha yang diterima. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa Model pembelajaran yang diterapkan di kelas eksperimen (model pembelajaran probing promting learning) dan di kelas kontrol (model pembelajaran langsung) terlihat adanya peredaan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada peserta didik. Dan kelas eksperimen lebih baik daripada kelas kontrol. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 86206-Jurusan Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 02-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | MRS SITI GUMANTI | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2023 15:52 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 12 Jan 2023 16:55 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/18972 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |