SEVIANI, BUNGA (2022) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KABEL LISTRIK (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA.
![[img]](https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_fulltext.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_01.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (912kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_02.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (238kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_03.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (283kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_04.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (276kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_05.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (92kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_ref.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (102kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text (SKRIPSI)
BungaSeviani_1111160145_Lamp.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (317kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE COURT'S DECISION IN THE CRIMINAL ACTION OF THE ELECTRICITY CABLE THEFT (CASE STUDY: STRICT STATE COURT DECISION NUMBER 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg) BUNGA SEVIANI 1111160145 ABSTRACT In three years the theft of electric cables has become a frequent problem, the impact of this theft has resulted in the inhibition of community activities in carrying out activities. One of the cases of theft of electric cables that occurred in a year where the perpetrators of the theft had carried out their actions at 20 different crime scenes where recidivist and non-recidivist defendants were charged with the same prosecution based on the indictment, the defendant was charged with a single charge of Article 363 of the Criminal Code paragraph (1) to- 4 and 5 with a criminal charge of 2 (two) years. Meanwhile, the judge decided imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 6 (months) as stipulated in Article 363 of the Criminal Code against defendants one and two. From this background, there is an identification of the problem of how effective the charges and demands of the public prosecutor are in the Serang District Court Decision Number 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg and what is the basis for the judge's consideration in making decisions on the basis of the public prosecutor's indictment. This study uses the theory of punishment and the basic theory of judge's judgment. Furthermore, the method used in the preparation of this thesis uses a normative juridical method, using a statutory approach. Sources of data used in this study are secondary data sources and are equipped with primary data, using data collection techniques, namely by means of library and field research. The results of this study state that defendant one in Decision Number 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg is a recidivist but the Public Prosecutor demands the same criminal sanctions against defendants two who are non-recidivists, so there should be a difference in the prosecution of criminal sanctions against the accused. one and defendant two because the demands of the Public Prosecutor influenced the judge's decision. The judge in this case can aggravate the criminal decision as described in Article 486 of the Criminal Code 1/3 of the main crime demanded by the public prosecutor. Keywords: Theft, Criminal Prosecutions Against Recidivists and Non-Recidivists, Basis for Judges' Consideration.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
|||||||||
| Additional Information: | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KABEL LISTRIK (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SERANG NOMOR 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg) BUNGA SEVIANI 1111160145 ABSTRAK Dalam tiga tahun pencurian kabel listrik menjadi permasalahan yang sering terjadi, dampak dari pencurian ini mengakibatkan terhambatnya aktivitas masyarakat dalam melakukan kegiatan. Salah satu kasus pencurian kabel listrik yang terjadi dalam setahun dimana para pelaku pencurian telah melakukan aksinya di 20 TKP berbeda dimana terdakwa residivis dan non residivis dituntut dalam penuntutan yang sama berdasarkan surat dakwaan, terdakwa dituntut dengan dakwaan tunggal Pasal 363 KUHP ayat (1) ke-4 dan ke-5 dengan tuntutan pidana 2 (dua) tahun. Sedangkan hakim memutus pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun 6 (bulan) sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 363 KUHP terhadap terdakwa satu dan dua. Dari latar belakang tersebut, terdapat identifikasi masalah bagaimana efektifitas dakwaan dan tuntutan jaksa penuntut umum dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg dan bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan atas dasar dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori pemidanaan dan teori dasar pertimbangan hakim. Selanjutnya metode yang digunakan dalam penyusunan skripsi ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undang (statue approach). Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sumber data sekunder dan dilengkapi dengan data primer, dengan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data yaitu dengan cara penelitian kepustakaan dan lapangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa terdakwa satu dalam Putusan Nomor 263/Pid.B/2020/PN Srg merupakan residivis namun Jaksa Penuntut Umum menuntut sanksi pidana yang sama terhadap terdakwa dua yang non-residivis, maka seharusnya ada perbedaan dalam penututan sanksi pidana terhadap terdakwa satu dan terdakwa dua karena tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum mempengaruhi pada putusan Hakim. Hakim dalam hal ini dapat memperberat putusan pidana sebagaimana yang dijelaskan dalam Pasal 486 KUHP 1/3 dari pidana pokok yang dituntut oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Kata Kunci: Pencurian, Tuntutan Pidana Terhadap Residivis dan Non-Residivis, Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim. | |||||||||
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | 01-Fakultas Hukum 01-Fakultas Hukum > 74201-Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mrs Bunga Seviani | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2023 09:16 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 05 Jan 2023 09:16 | |||||||||
| URI: | http://eprints.untirta.ac.id/id/eprint/18843 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |